Aug 2026· American Journal of Audiology· pp.
1-12
· 1 citation· 35 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The highest listening effort was experienced in situations with low sound quality, while the lowest effort was experienced in situations involving speech perception in quiet and lipreading, and the LEQ appears to be suitable for measuring adult cochlear implant users' subjective listening effort in daily life.
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to assess the subjective listening effort in daily life situations of adult cochlear implant (CI) users in a clinical setting using a questionnaire designed for hearing aid (HA) users.
Method
The listening effort of CI users with progressive sensorineural hearing loss was measured using the Listening Effort Questionnaire (LEQ). In addition, speech comprehension results and demographic data were recorded in order to statistically examine correlations with the LEQ results.
Results
A total of 112 participants-unilateral CI users with bilateral deafness, bilateral CI users, unilateral CI users with single-sided deafness (SSD), and bimodal users (CI + HA)-were included in the study (Mage = 56.5 years, SD = 13.6). The median listening effort score (scale ranges from 0 = no effort to 10 = maximum effort) was 5.7 for situations affected by the signal-to-noise ratio, 6.6 for situations with low sound quality, and 3.8 for quiet situations with lipreading. The differences in listening effort between the three types of situations were significant. Speech comprehension in noise was associated with listening effort in noisy situations. In situations with low sound quality and quiet situations with lipreading, less listening effort was required by participants with SSD than by bilateral CI users and bimodal users.
Conclusions
The LEQ appears to be suitable for measuring adult CI users' subjective listening effort in daily life. The highest listening effort was experienced in situations with low sound quality, while the lowest effort was experienced in situations involving speech perception in quiet and lipreading.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether hearing aids improve speech recognition in noise and self-reported listening outcomes in clinically heterogeneous adults with subjective listening difficulties in noise.
DESIGN
Prospective, uncontrolled, within-subject intervention study. Participants completed multidimensional baseline...
Joon Shin, Harvey Dillon· International Journal of Aud...· 0 citations
OBJECTIVES
Adults typically receive only one cochlear implant (CI). Bimodal fitting (i.e. a contralateral hearing aid) is recommended when aidable hearing remains. However, standard hearing aids typically function independently from a CI, requiring the user to integrate disparate signals. Integrated bimodal technology...
Manal Alfakhri, N. Campbell, Ben Lineton et al.· Cochlear Implants Internatio...· 0 citations
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in postlinguistically deaf adults with prolonged auditory deprivation.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 95 patients who underwent CI between 2020 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years. Main outcome measures included the pu...
Marta L. Lopes, Hugo Figueiredo, F. Bartolomeu et al.· Cochlear Implants Internatio...· 0 citations
ObjectivesTo evaluate the effects of cochlear implantation on speech recognition in noise, sound localization, QoL, and tinnitus in adults with SSD.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This retrospective cohort study with prospective follow-up included 12 adults with SSD who underwent cochlear implantation between 2015 and 2024 at...
Kasper Møller Boje Rasmussen, A. Kressner, Quirin Mühlberger et al.· Acta Oto-Laryngologica· 1 citation
Evidence is found that utilizing passive flat-attenuating ER-20 earplugs, and active flat-attenuating MP9-15 earplugs provide better speech understanding in noise for normal hearing listeners.
Trevor A. Simones, Darryl M. Horn, M. Pienkowski· 0 citations
In this retrospective cohort of unilateral hearing-aid users, an REM-based fitting pathway was not associated with statistically significant 3-month audiometric or patient-reported outcome differences compared with manufacturer first-fit followed by routine fine-tuning; this does not establish equivalence or isolate th...
J. Lee, Tae Hoon Kong, J. Lee et al.· PLoS ONE· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.