Sep 2026· Journal of Air Transportation· 0 citations· 24 references
Abstract
The transition to alternative fuels offers a promising pathway to reduce aviation’s environmental footprint. This study investigates the impact of replacing conventional jet fuel with power-to-liquid hydrogen ([Formula: see text]), power-to-liquefied natural gas (Pt-LNG), power-to-liquefied petroleum gas (Pt-LPG), and power-to-sustainable aviation fuel (Pt-SAF) across five representative classes of transport aircraft operating within the U.S. domestic network. To isolate the effects of fuel utilization, the analysis focuses on direct operational emissions associated with fuel energy utilization. Mission simulations are performed utilizing RCAIDE, while emissions are estimated through a chemical reactor network model. The study captures trends for each aircraft-fuel combination and quantifies combustor- and mission-level emissions. Results highlight patterns in emissions and energy use across different classes of aircraft. [Formula: see text] operation produces no direct [Formula: see text] or CO emissions at the aircraft level but results in higher [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] emissions compared to Pt-SAF. Consequently, [Formula: see text] yields the lowest [Formula: see text] emissions per revenue passenger-kilometer among the fuels analyzed. Pt-LNG and Pt-LPG offer intermediate benefits, exhibiting progressively lower [Formula: see text] emissions relative to conventional jet fuel, alongside modest changes in other pollutants. These findings aim to offer insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with integrating alternative fuels into the existing U.S. domestic aviation network.
Lean-burn engines are designed to reduce emissions, and sustainable alternative fuels provide additional potential for lowering particle emissions. However, the magnitude of the benefits from these mitigation levers remains poorly constrained, limiting robust predictions of aviation’s climate impact. We present in-flig...
R. Dischl, Daniel Sauer, C. Voigt et al.· Science Advances· 0 citations
Radically reducing the carbon footprint of civil aviation by 2050 may not be possible via technological advancements on aircraft and propulsion system level alone, but with the combined effort of the integration of alternative fuels and carbon offsetting strategies. The paper examines potential decarbonisation path...
Adham Sarhan, Pavlos Rompokos, Ioannis Roumeliotis et al.· Aeronautical Journal· 0 citations
Current research in commercial aviation is exploring numerous propulsion and aircraft technologies to mitigate its environmental impact. While purely hydrogen-powered aircraft face manifold challenges, combining hydrogen and conventional fuel may facilitate the introduction of hydrogen-based flight. This study dives in...
Ulrich Carsten Johannes Rischmüller, Alexandros Lessis, Patrick Egerer et al.· Aerospace· 0 citations
Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is entering the mandate era while still representing a sub-percent share of global aviation fuel. This Perspective argues that the next bottleneck is not only production capacity, but climate allocation: which carbon sources, hydrogen, renewable electrons and molecular structures should...
Francisco Morales-Leal· Journal of Chemical Engineer...· 0 citations
Livestock carriers contribute to greenhouse gas emissions through the continued use of conventional fossil fuels. This study presents a theoretical, steady-state case study of replacing the Wärtsilä W7X35 diesel engine of the livestock carrier Motor Vessel MV Ganado Express with a Wärtsilä 46F methanol-fueled engine (7...
M. Elmallah, Hamid Reza Soltani Motlagh, Ernesto Madariaga et al.· Environments· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.