Skip to content
Open access

Implementing Metric Temporal Answer Set Programming

Sep 2026 · Theory and Practice of Logic Programming · pp. 1-66 · 0 citations · 13 references

TL;DR

This work develops a computational approach to Metric Answer Set Programming to express quantitative temporal constrains, such as durations and deadlines, and effectively decouples metric ASP from the granularity of time, resulting in a solution that is independent of time precision.

Abstract

We develop a computational approach to Metric Answer Set Programming (ASP) to express quantitative temporal constrains, such as durations and deadlines. We investigate two specific fragments: plain metric logic programs, restricted to local temporal constraints, and general metric logic programs, which allow for arbitrary metric formulas. A central challenge in this context is maintaining scalability when dealing with fine-grained timing constraints, which can significantly exacerbate grounding bottleneck of ASP. To address this issue, we propose translations of both fragments into standard ASP and ASP extended with difference constraints, a simplified form of linear constraints, and prove their correctness and completeness. Our implementation, realized via meta-encodings, effectively decouples metric ASP from the granularity of time, resulting in a solution that is independent of time precision.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

On Synthesis of Metric Interval Temporal Logics

This paper presents the first framework to tackle precise timed passive learning for an expressive timed logic, Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL) without relying on predefined templates or restricted logic fragments.

Hsi-Ming Ho, S. Krishna, Khushraj Madnani · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Integration of Minimal Reasons in AMOSUM Constraints

This paper proposes and formalizes two new minimization algorithms that guarantee subset-minimal reasons and ensures cardinality-minimal reasons in the AMOSUM constraint and demonstrates that extending the solver wasp with these minimization strategies leads to substantial performance improvements.

Salvatore Fiorentino · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

ClosureBench: A Constructive Benchmark for Compositional Graph Reasoning

ClosureBench is introduced, a constructive benchmark for compositional graph-relational reasoning with programmatically verified ground truth with programmatically verified ground truth: each task's reference answer is computed by executing a program in the Ein tensor-logic language, ensuring machine-verified correctne...

S. Goria · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

HARDEN: Constrained Evolutionary Search for Harder, Answer-Preserving Evaluation Cases

Language models are often evaluated on curated benchmarks that underrepresent the complexity of enterprise deployments. We introduce HARDEN, a constrained evolutionary search method to adapt the input of existing evaluation cases into more challenging variants while keeping their expected outputs fixed. HARDEN searches...

Aditya Kumaran, Rahul Singhal, Karime Maamari et al. · 0 citations

AMO-Aware Optimization in Answer Set Programming ★

This work introduces amomaximize, a novel maximization statement that integrates AMO constraints directly into the objective function, and shows that, in specific scenarios, this approach improves performance compared to clingo.

Mario Alviano, Carmine Dodaro, Salvatore Fiorentino · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.