Aug 2026· Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics· Vol 47, pp. 523 - 541· 0 citations· 61 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This paper argues for an expansion of moral concern in bioethics beyond sentience-based and status-based frameworks, and reconceive reification not just as a social pathology but as a moral vice: a disordered, objectifying mode of perception.
Abstract
In this paper, I argue for an expansion of moral concern in bioethics beyond sentience-based and status-based frameworks. Drawing on Lukács' and Honneth's work on reification, I show that even where the sentience, species membership, or moral status of an entity is unknown, there are compelling ethical reasons to be concerned about the creation, manipulation, and use of such entities. I reconceive reification not just as a social pathology but as a moral vice: a disordered, objectifying mode of perception. Understood in this way, reification provides a flexible normative framework that applies across a wide range of entities, including humans, non-human animals, plants, ecosystems, and even inanimate objects. This vice-based approach helps explain why certain modes of interaction are ethically flawed regardless of the moral status of the entity in question. This facilitates a more inclusive ethical sensibility suited to emerging biotechnologies and the ecological challenges that pose an increasingly complex challenge for bioethics.
What is our responsibility to the absent presence of the dead and what is the nature of the encounter with those who persist in haunting us, not through personal memories but as ungraspable remainders of lives past? I approach the issue through a reflection on bioarchives, not as places of either continuing medical edu...
M. Shildrick· Journal of Bioethical Inquir...· 0 citations
Bioconservatism rose to prominence in bioethics at the turn of the millennium but has since declined in influence, particularly in Anglo-American academic and policy contexts. Critics argue that it relies excessively on intuition, emotion, and vague concepts such as dignity, and therefore lacks rational justification f...
A conceptual geography of the possible meanings, creative realities, and likely limits of human bioenhancement is presented, to explore critically such concerns regarding forms of human biotechnology, reasons for and objections to pursing various forms of enhancement, and the centrality of such philosophical questions...
M. Cherry, Rui-Ping Fan· Journal of Medicine and Phil...· 0 citations
In 1982, Stephen Toulmin famously argued that medicine “saved the life of ethics.” This article asks whether AI is now doing something similar—and finds that the answer splits. Working from a broadly Toulminian conception of ethics as a discipline that responds to societal demand for normative orientation by providing...
Today, the call to decolonize bioethics is prominent, yet its meaning and practical implications remain contested. In this article, I distinguish between two models of decolonization-strong and soft-and offer a constructive path forward. Strong decolonization seeks to reject Western-rooted bioethical principles in favo...
J. C. Gundayao· Developing World Bioethics· 0 citations
When, if ever, is it permissible to afford special consideration to friends and family? How can we strive to be objective in our thinking, and is this always a feasible or appropriate aim?
This book examines the categories of impartiality and objectivity by showing how they frame certain debates in epistemology, moral...
DeLapp Kevin· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.