Skip to content
Conference

StanceBank: An Efficient Reasoning Framework for Large-Scale Stance Detection on Social Media

Aug 2026 · 2026 12th International Conference on Big Data and Information Analytics (BigDIA) · pp. 258-265 · 0 citations · 23 references

Abstract

Stance detection underpins a wide range of large-scale data analytics applications on social media, including opinion monitoring, policy evaluation, and misinformation tracking. While prompting-based methods leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong zero-shot performance, they invariably perform per-sample reasoning, re-deriving target-specific knowledge for every input. This pattern increases request-path API calls and becomes a key bottleneck when applied to the millions of opinionated posts generated daily. We observe that real-world stance corpora exhibit pronounced target clustering—a small number of targets account for the vast majority of samples—and that the target-level reasoning required within each cluster is largely sample-invariant. Motivated by this structural property, we propose StanceBank, a two-stage framework that explicitly decouples target-level reasoning from sample-level reasoning. In the offline Bank Construction stage, an LLM is prompted with a small set of annotated samples per target to elicit a structured, reusable reasoning framework capturing stance expression patterns, related entities, common pitfalls, and recommended reasoning steps. In the online Inference stage, each sample retrieves the corresponding framework and predicts its stance with a single LLM call; for unseen targets, the system falls back to Plan-and-Solve reasoning and can incrementally extend the Bank. Experiments on three benchmark datasets (SemEval-2016, P-Stance, VAST) and two LLM backbones (GPT-4o-mini and Claude Haiku 4.5) demonstrate that StanceBank matches strong reasoning baselines such as Plan-and-Solve in accuracy while reducing average request-path calls by 17% to 34%. When an additional plan-to-framework conversion is charged to every miss, the fixed-target benchmarks retain a total-call advantage, whereas open-target VAST does not. Our results identify target recurrence as the key condition for cost-efficient reasoning reuse.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Not All or None: Dynamic Construction of Target-aware Memory Graph for Conversational Stance Detection

A novel method that dynamically leverages target-related statements for conversational stance detection by employing a stepwise, entropy-guided backtracking mechanism to selectively activate memory from historical conversations and dynamically constructs a target-aware graph to model the stance relations among utteranc...

Yi-Fan Xiang, Bin Liang, Yu-Qi Huang et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

MMDS-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models on Dynamic Stance in Social Media Interactions

This work introduces MMDS-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark for multimodal dynamic stance classification in social media parent-reply interactions, and evaluates 12 closed-source and open-source multimodal large language models and proposed reference-grounded LLM-judge protocol for assessing reasoning quality.

Yuzhe Ding, Kang He, Li Zheng et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

Stance Drift: How AI-mediated Communication Distorts Our Message

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly mediate human communication, from drafting emails to summarizing scientific reports, yet whether they faithfully preserve a speaker's position remains largely untested. We model AI-mediated communication as a two-step generation-extraction pipeline: one LLM produces an argument...

Ling-Chong Liu, Yan-Fei Zhou, Jacob Bien et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

Inductive Claims Extraction at Scale

A large part of political discourse on social media is built and expressed at a level of claims: i.e. declarative, typically single-clause statements, which convey a particular interpretation of reality and can range from factual to evaluative. Moreover, rather than occurring randomly, claims coalesce, recur in pattern...

Sandrine Chausson, Björn Ross · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.