2026· Poster Volume 0008 The 2026 Twenty-Second International Conference on Intelligent Computing July 23-26, 2026 Toronto, Canada· pp. 1044-1065· 0 citations
TL;DR
CARE-Bench is presented, an evaluation harness and protocol that makes results across heterogeneous agentic detectors directly comparable, and is contamination-resistant, providing temporal-holdout and de-duplication controls that address the documented label-noise and leakage problems of existing corpora.
Abstract
Agentic systems for software-security detection have advanced quickly, from passive classifiers to cyber reasoning systems that autonomously find and patch vulnerabilities. Yet progress is hard to measure: systems are reported on incomparable datasets, with metrics that ignore cost, and on corpora whose labels are known to be noisy and prone to train-test contamination. We present CARE-Bench, an evaluation harness and protocol that makes results across heterogeneous agentic detectors directly comparable. CARE-Bench makes three design commitments. First, it is capability-stratified: every system is scored along the four levels of detection, localization, triage, and remediation, so that a single-call classifier and a multi-agent patcher are placed on the same ladder. Second, it treats cost as a first-class metric, reporting tokens, dollars, and wall-clock time, and dollars per true positive, so that accuracy and expense are reported together. Third, it is contamination-resistant, providing temporal-holdout and de-duplication controls that address the documented label-noise and leakage problems of existing corpora. CARE-Bench does not introduce a new vulnerability dataset; instead it unifies existing public corpora under one canonical schema through dataset adapters, and ships as open-source code with a reproducible runner, a metric suite, detector interfaces, and a leaderboard schema that rejects submissions omitting cost or contamination provenance. We describe the design, position it against recent benchmarks, and release the harness to support reproducible, cost-aware evaluation of the next generation of security agents.
Security evaluation of tool-using agents requires judging actions in context, yet generative judges add latency, explanation overhead, and output-validation failures. We study whether JEV, a typed decision model, offers a useful alternative for retrospective trace classification. We evaluate JEV and four generative jud...
Autonomous penetration-testing harnesses use large language models (LLMs) for reconnaissance, exploitation, and reporting, but often rely on those same models to confirm findings, grade severity, and select agents. This can lead to false positives, inflated severity, and wasted compute. We examine how System One decisi...
LLM agents are increasingly used for security tasks: vulnerability discovery, exploit reproduction, and patch generation. Improving them at the model level demands expert demonstrations or computable rewards, which security tasks rarely offer: traces are costly, failures hard to diagnose, rewards sparse, and non-comput...
Saad Ullah, Yiğitcan Kaya, Christopher Kruegel et al.· 0 citations
This paper presents a multi-agent DevSecOps framework that integrates static code scanning, large language model (LLM) based security reasoning, automated repair generation, policy-as-code enforcement, and runtime monitoring into a unified event-driven pipeline. Five specialized agents collaborate through LangGraph sha...
Hai-Ning Fan, Li-Jie Zheng, Chen-Hao Han et al.· Journal of networking and ne...· 0 citations
Agentic systems are rapidly moving to production, where they read untrusted inputs, call tools with real permissions, and act autonomously, expanding the security surface beyond chat-only models. Yet standard evaluations remain single-turn and fail to capture multi-step agent vulnerabilities. We present a systematic bl...
The results show that context-aware LLM analysis can provide reliable injection localisation and actionable remediation beyond skill-level flagging alone, and show that context-aware LLM analysis can provide reliable injection localisation and actionable remediation beyond skill-level flagging alone.
Donato Mecca, Alberto Verna, Youness Bouchari et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.