The article critically analyses the methodological fragmentation of contemporary renewable energy sources (RES) research. It is shown that existing approaches tend to focus on a single aspect — technological, economic, or environmental — without accounting for systemic interconnections. Based on a literature review, three systemic shortcomings are identified: incompleteness of life cycle assessment (dominance of the operational phase, ignoring raw material extraction and disposal); fragmentation in accounting for environmental, economic, and technological factors (limitation to direct CO₂ emissions, underestimation of indirect effects and market dynamics); and insufficient integration of quantitative and qualitative methods (social and qualitative environmental changes remain outside the framework). The problem of ignoring cross-sectoral effects, in particular the interaction of RES with agricultural land use, is considered separately; the potential of agrivoltaics to reduce land-use conflicts and increase total productivity is shown, including increased soil moisture and crop yields. An interdisciplinary framework is proposed that synthesises life cycle assessment (LCA), systems analysis, and qualitative methods. The framework includes four blocks — technological, environmental, economic, and social-landscape; for agrivoltaic projects, additional indicators of water efficiency, total income per hectare, and Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) are provided. Indicators are normalised and aggregated into an integral sustainability index; Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) can be used to validate the economic block. The scientific novelty lies in specific procedures for linking quantitative and qualitative data, as well as in the emphasis on adaptation to regional conditions. The framework can be used to support regional energy strategy development, including under conditions of limited data and high importance of local factors, for comparing different types of RES and hybrid schemes.
Background: Warehouse systems are critical nodes in global supply chains, yet the holistic assessment of their sustainability performance remains a significant research challenge. Existing studies tend to examine sustainability dimensions in isolation, predominantly focusing on energy consumption and cost optimization...
Dimitra Tzanetou, S. Ponis, G. Plakas et al.· Logistics· 0 citations
Green Accounting integrates environmental costs and benefits into traditional accounting systems to measure the impact of human activity on ecological systems and resources. Despite the enactment of Republic Act No. 11995 or the Philippine Ecosystem and Natural Accounting System (PENCAS) Law, studies on the adoption an...
E. G. Lumdang· International journal of res...· 0 citations
Climate change and increasing pressure on natural resources highlight the limitations of the predominantly linear economic model of production and consumption, and the need for more integrated sustainable approaches. Circular economy (CE) strategies offer a potential alternative, contributing to reduction of emissions...
E. Lakatos, Vladut Vasile Constandoiu, Andreea Loredana Rhazzali et al.· Sustainability· 0 citations
The circular economy (CE) has gained increasing attention as a framework for improving resource efficiency and sustainability in agricultural systems. However, circular agriculture remains an evolving field characterized by conceptual diversity, heterogeneous practices, and different assessment approaches. This review...
M. Tomaš-Simin, Dragana Novaković, Dragan Milić et al.· Economies· 0 citations
This study provides a systematic and integrative review of ESG and sustainability reporting in extractive industries, aiming to assess the current state of the literature and identify key theoretical, methodological, and contextual gaps. Given the growing importance of extractive sectors in supporting global sustaina...
Marco Casale, A. Faraudello· Corporate Social Responsibil...· 0 citations
Sustainability assessment has become central to production systems, but existing tools often provide fragmented, product-oriented, static, or poorly interpretable evaluations. Current assessment methods rarely integrate production functions with territorial characteristics, ecosystem services and dynamic data flows. Mo...
D. Biagini· Environmental and Sustainabi...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.