Skip to content
Open access

Theorizing digital-relational harm in nursing.

Jul 2026 · Nursing Ethics · pp. 9697330261465859 · 1 citation · 69 references
Medicine

TL;DR

By naming digital-relational harm, the paper reframes digital transformation as an ethical and relational challenge, not merely a technical one, and argues that safeguarding relational integrity must become a central concern in the design, governance, and evaluation of digital health systems.

Abstract

Digital infrastructures such as platforms, algorithms, and artificial intelligence (AI) are rapidly reshaping the conditions under which nursing care is enacted, raising ethical concerns that extend beyond efficiency. Indeed, as nursing becomes increasingly embedded within platformized and AI-mediated ecosystems, the discipline is confronted with new forms of harm arising from the disruptions to the relational foundations that make ethical nursing possible. Despite this, the discipline lacks a coherent conceptual framework capable of naming, analysing, and responding to the relational injuries produced by digital infrastructures and platformization. This paper introduces the concept of digital-relational harm. Drawing on six philosophical and theoretical traditions: African relational ontology, Western phenomenology and care ethics, Eastern relational philosophies, relational ethics, Labour Process Theory, and digital professionalism, the paper demonstrates that digital-relational harm arises when digital infrastructures disrupt person becoming, displace embodied and intersubjective presence, disturb relational harmony, erode trust and mutuality, fragment labour and continuity, and destabilise professional identity. These disruptions are structural, relational, and ontological. By naming digital-relational harm, the paper reframes digital transformation as an ethical and relational challenge, not merely a technical one, and argues that safeguarding relational integrity must become a central concern in the design, governance, and evaluation of digital health systems. Digital-relational harm offers nursing ethics a new analytic lens for understanding how digital environments shape moral life and provides a foundation for future empirical, theoretical, and policy-oriented work.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Relational Ontology in a Digital World: Integrating African Personhood and Platformized Nursing.

The discipline of nursing has entered a historical moment in which two profound forces converge: the global rise of digital platform labour and the resurgence of relational, communitarian ontologies rooted in African philosophy. Yet these forces are rarely theorised together, despite shaping the same discipline. This p...

Jonathan Bayuo · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

When Civility Harms: Relational and Reputational Bullying in Mental Health Nursing

A conceptual and discursive approach is adopted to examine relational and reputational forms of bullying in mental health nursing practice and academia, arguing that under managerialism, commodification, and performance metrics, reputation functions as organisational currency.

Robert Batterbee, Chanchal Kurup · 1 citation
Aug 2026

Digital Justice in Social Work: An Argument for a New Ethical Principle

It is argued that social work should explicitly recognize a Principle of Digital Justice alongside its existing ethical principles, not as a departure from tradition but as a necessary extension of the profession’s historic commitment to human rights and structural justice.

Abhishek Chakraborty · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

When Care Does Not Count: Epistemic Injustice and the Organisational Recognition of Nursing Knowledge

ABSTRACT This discussion paper examines how care‐based nursing judgement becomes recognised, narrowed or excluded as professional knowledge within healthcare organisations. Nursing care is often described as relational, ethical, practical or compassionate, yet these descriptions may obscure its epistemic content: train...

María Antuña-Casal, Marta Rios · 0 citations
Review Open access May 2026

A Multilevel Framework for the Safe and Ethical Use of AI in Mental Health Practice.

PRISM provides an operational bridge between technological governance and psychological practice, supporting responsible, person-centred AI use in clinical contexts and articulates four operational principles (digital autonomy, affective transparency, algorithmic justice, and relational care).

Ignacio Pedrosa · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.