Comparative CFD Analysis of Double-Skin Façade Cavities Under Extreme Hot-Arid Conditions
Abstract
Double-skin façades (DSFs) can moderate heat transfer and airflow between the outdoor environment and the building interior; however, their performance in hot-arid climates is highly dependent on cavity geometry, ventilation arrangement, and the interaction between the airflow and any active cooling surfaces. The objective of this study is to establish, under a single idealised extreme hot-arid design point, how sealed, ventilated and actively cooled double-skin façade cavities differ in their predicted temperature, velocity and turbulent kinetic energy fields, and which arrangements merit controlled follow-up study. The four configurations are treated as an idealised comparative case study rather than as validated building-performance predictions. This exploratory study uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to compare the aerothermal behaviour of four DSF cavity configurations under prescribed external air and outer-wall temperatures of 50 °C, an inner-wall temperature of 24 °C, and an external inlet velocity of 3.06 m/s. The configurations comprise a sealed 0.4 m cavity (M1), a wind-driven ventilated 0.4 m cavity (M2), the same ventilated cavity with six 25 mm cooling pipes at 10 °C (M3), and a concept-stage lateral-flow arrangement combining a 0.10 m cavity, a 0.025 m slit and four 80 mm cooling pipes at 10 °C (M4). The simulations employ the standard k-ε turbulence model with fixed thermal boundary conditions. Along the reported sampling lines, M1 exhibited a nearly uniform air temperature of approximately 45.7 °C, whereas M2 remained close to the imposed 50 °C external-air temperature. M3 produced lower temperatures in the immediate vicinity of the cooling pipes, but most of the sampled profile remained near ambient conditions. M4 exhibited a broader spanwise temperature range of approximately 26.9–50 °C, with local pipe-adjacent air temperatures approaching 24 °C and cooler regions developing along parts of the lateral flow path. The findings provide preliminary concept-screening evidence and support further controlled parametric analysis, higher-fidelity modelling, and experimental validation.