This paper presents a state-of-the-art review of AI-native network control, focusing on the composition and runtime assurance of autonomous control loops, and identifies dependency-aware runtime assurance as a research direction for assured composition of AI-native network control loops.
Abstract
The evolution towards autonomous and AI-native telecommunication networks is transforming network control from predefined automation towards distributed and intelligent decision-making. Advances in closed-loop automation, O-RAN, Network Digital Twins, AI-driven orchestration, and autonomous agents enable multiple specialized control functions to operate concurrently across network domains and timescales. This introduces a system-level assurance challenge: individually acceptable decisions may interact through shared resources and network state, while changes in their operational context may invalidate assumptions under which they were evaluated. This paper presents a state-of-the-art review of AI-native network control, focusing on the composition and runtime assurance of autonomous control loops. It examines closed-loop and zero-touch automation, intelligent controllers, Network Digital Twins, AI-driven orchestration, autonomous agents, trustworthy AI, and runtime assurance. The analysis shows that these directions provide important foundations for autonomous operation but lack a unified mechanism for assuring heterogeneous control loops whose decisions depend on shared and dynamically changing network state. To address this gap, the paper identifies dependency-aware runtime assurance as a research direction for assured composition of AI-native network control loops. The proposed perspective associates decisions with assumptions and dependencies on which their validity relies, monitors changes that may invalidate accepted decisions, and supports runtime resolution of concurrent control interactions. A telecom use case and an initial architecture and formal model illustrate the concept and identify open challenges in dependency representation, runtime validation, conflict resolution, latency-aware assurance, and experimental evaluation.
An agentic OP framework autonomously reconciles stringent Service Level Agreements (SLAs) while enhancing infrastructure energy efficiency and establishing a scalable blueprint for cross-domain Network-as-a-Service (NaaS) models that align standardised exposure with 6G autonomous requirements.
XOps is proposed, a five-layer reference architecture integrating PlatformOps, DataOps, MLOps and AIOps beneath an Agentic Orchestration layer with Policy-as-Code governance, together with a continuous-time Markov chain model quantifying the availability effect of agent-driven remediation.
Mete Köse, E. Küçüksille· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
A comprehensive review of AI-enabled O-RAN systems and a taxonomy of AI approaches for O-RAN, covering machine learning, deep reinforcement learning (DRL), digital-twin-assisted optimization, and emerging foundation-model-based architectures are presented.
Ryan Barker, Alireza Ebrahimi Dorcheh, Tolunay Seyfi et al.· 0 citations
The transition from single-shot generative models to autonomous, goal-directed agents represents a structural departure from fixed-pipeline automation. Low-code orchestration platforms such as n8n increasingly supply the operational substrate for this transition, handling function invocation, state persistence, and int...
Swapnil Mohan Gaikwad, Sourav Saha, Ranjit Kumar Reddy Ponugoti et al.· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
The examination of the full end-to-end process flow, including off-line and real-time phases, ensures cover for Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) objectives by design and the definition of a robust plan for evaluation in on-line use.
E. Campbell· American International Journ...· 0 citations
Alongside its cybersecurity focus, the MAIA-eei module extends the architecture to energy-efficiency monitoring and anomaly detection, enabling analysis and optimisation of plant energy consumption and, more broadly, process optimisation.
M. Slunjski· IEEE Access· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.