A first-order multimodal logic programming system called MMLP, which represents exactly the same answer substitutions as Nguyen's pure logical KDI4s5-MPROLOG on their common fragment, while admitting a strictly larger program and query language.
Abstract
This paper presents a first-order multimodal logic programming system called MMLP. The system accepts arbitrary formulas as both programs and queries, without restricting either side to Horn clauses or a separate goal grammar. Its declarative semantics is given independently by a Hilbert system for selected D, T, I, B, 4, and 5 modal principles. Execution uses a nested proof calculus with finite grammar certificates for modal propagation. Certificate reachability is equivalent to the associated Horn closure, certificate existence is decidable, and the calculus is cut-free complete. For quantified answer computation, we give a unification algorithm based on permission sets that controls eigenparameter scope. The algorithm always terminates and fails exactly when no admissible solution exists. A successful run returns a unifier that is itself admissible and through which all admissible solutions factor. Computed answers are declaratively correct, and each declaratively correct answer is an ordinary output instance of a computed answer. In proof search, MMLP admits syntactic focalization and a fair and complete enumeration of focused answers. It represents exactly the same answer substitutions as Nguyen's pure logical KDI4s5-MPROLOG on their common fragment, while admitting a strictly larger program and query language.
This work presents a deductive verification framework based on a weighted assertion language and an intermediate verification language, whose weight domains are ordered structures with implication and coimplication, which let verification conditions express lower- and upper-bound obligations internally.
Emma Ahrens, Samuel Rode, Philipp Schröer et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes to consider the three refined GAS principles as alternative principles for answer set semantics in general and for answer set and world view construction in particular and analyzes the computational complexity of well-supportedness and the rational answer set and world view semantics.
Yi-Dong Shen, Thomas Eiter· ACM Transactions on Computat...· 0 citations
On a new benchmark of 77 problems with an exact oracle, translation to Answer Set Programming is faithful on six of seven domains and fails only on aggregate coverage scheduling, which concentrates the translation tax in one diagnosable pattern.
Solving Boolean polynomial systems, or equivalently, SAT-solving, based on the XNF and the XLIN proof system outperforms classical methods not only theoretically, but based on the new conflict-driven XNF clause learning methods developed here, it is possible to implement an XNF solver with good practical efficiency.
Julian Danner, Martin Kreuzer· Journal of Artificial Intell...· 0 citations
We prove decidability of Simpson's intuitionistic modal logic IK$ by working directly with cut-free nested proofs. Once the end formula is fixed, only finitely many combinations of input and output formulae can occur at a node, although the modal tree itself remains unbounded. We order these nested sequents by rooted h...
An evaluation engine that is algebra-generic and amenable to differentiation, together with an executable specification of the algebras it can accept is presented, both forward and backward.
Konstantinos Kogkalidis· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.