Skip to content
Open access

SaaS Entitlement Governance: A Reproducible Model for Detecting and Reclaiming Over-Provisioned Access at Enterprise Scale

Aug 2026 · Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science · 0 citations · 45 references

TL;DR

A reproducible model, rooted in the logic of access entitlement overprovisioning, guides the detection of temporary access entitlement provisioning in SaaS applications with low-volume datasets and can guide the operationalization of entitlement governance within enterprise companies and likewise serve as a reference point for any critical SaaS service.

Abstract

Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) applications have revolutionized information technology service consumption and delivery, garnering substantial adoption among enterprises. Nevertheless, the ease of onboarding – frequently expediting the process to oblivion – often results in excessive and obsolete entitlement provisioning. While traditional entitlement management practices—implementing governance structures, processes, and technologies—address these issues, the sheer number of applications, along with the lack of central governance bodies, recommends a detection-and-reclamation model instead. Automated SaaS entitlement governance requires only a scalable, enterprise-wide data architecture to record access requests. Such an architecture, combined with entitlement and usage metrics, provides everything necessary to operationalize the model at enterprise scale. When an application is subject to governing controls, risk and compliance teams possess the tooling and information to verify data and inform relevant stakeholders. Specifically, these teams can conduct entitlement overprovisioning checks and escalate as appropriate. Consistent overprovisioning check results can inform reclamation decisions and facilitate periodic maintenance tasks. A reproducible model, rooted in the logic of access entitlement overprovisioning, guides the detection of temporary access entitlement provisioning in SaaS applications with low-volume datasets. When access is granted for a specific task and subsequently revoked, these temporary provisions are suitable for governance board requests. The model can therefore guide the operationalization of entitlement governance within enterprise companies and likewise serve as a reference point for any critical SaaS service.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

OpenGRCRMF: A Vendor-Neutral Framework for Teaching and Modeling RMF Automation, Continuous Authorization, and Zero Trust Governance

Abstract—Federal and regulated organizations continue to rely on document-centric Authorization to Operate (ATO) processes even as the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF), continuous monitoring guidance, Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA), and continuous authorization initiatives require more continuous, evidence-driven ri...

Anand Janjal · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Governance Frameworks for ServiceNow Platform Sprawl in Large Enterprises

As ServiceNow adoption deepens within large enterprises, platform sprawl — characterized by uncontrolled customization, scope creep, orphaned configurations, and upgrade resistance — has emerged as a critical operational risk. This paper analyzes the root causes and consequences of ServiceNow platform sprawl and propos...

Abhinav Reddy Pullikallu, Kumar Movva Dinesh, Madhan Kumar Sugasi · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Establishing a Scalable and Healthy CMDB: A Governance Framework for Enterprise Configuration Management in ServiceNow

Enterprise configuration management databases accumulate structural data quality debt as organizations scale, manifesting as duplicate configuration items (CIs), inconsistent classification hierarchies, degraded discovery coverage, and unmeasured health. This paper presents a structured governance framework for establi...

Anuvrata Arora · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

AspisAI: A Canonical, Machine-Interpretable Governance Framework for Automated Multi-Standard Compliance Monitoring

Organisations operating in regulated and critical-infrastructure sectors must satisfy multiple, heterogeneous cybersecurity and privacy instruments simultaneously, including but not limited to ISO/IEC~27001, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework~2.0, Cyber Essentials, and the GDPR. In practice, these obligations are managed...

Tsafac Nkombong Regine Cyrille, Hasan Dağ, R. Creutzburg et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

The Last Human Gate: Forward Deployed Engineering for Governance Automation

Enterprise governance requires decisions, evidence, and accountable authority; it does not require every review task to retain its current human implementation. We develop a task-substitution framework for Digital Governance Frameworks (DGF), treating each gate as an executable contract. Substitution requires sufficien...

Jeremy Canale · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

A Systematization of Knowledge on DeFi Vaults: Architectures, Curation Mechanisms, and Strategy Design

Decentralized finance (DeFi) vaults are smart-contract-based asset management systems that pool deposits, execute programmable strategies, and mint tokenized shares representing claims on underlying assets and strategy performance. As vault designs have evolved from early yield aggregators to modular, actively managed...

D. Mancino, Luca Pennella · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.