Skip to content

The Read-Reflect-Respond (R3) Framework: Designing AI-resilient Assignments to Promote Authentic Learning and Academic Integrity

A. Sahu Chandrakant Kumar Singh A. K. Malik
2025 · International Journal of Science and Engineering · 0 citations

TL;DR

The idea of AI-resilient assignments maintaining academic integrity with product- and process-based evaluation approach is proposed, similar to the open-book system, where they require human intelligence, independent thinking, and personal understanding to solve them correctly.

Abstract

The emergence of AI in education has created both opportunities and challenges, especially in students’ examinations and assessments. Today, AI can solve almost any problem in seconds and provide answers in any style. This is useful in education, but its lead to misuse of AI in assignments and examinations, where students can solve the questions through AI, without independently thinking about the questions. AI provides simpler solutions, according to the prompt and can mimic human-like responses. Using AI to solve assignment questions has posed a challenge to the development of creative and critical thinking. Recently, students are directly copying AI-generated texts and pasting or writing in their answer sheets. Although AI has the potential to solve any problem, it has become a challenge for educators to evaluate ethically. There are several tools available, like plagiarism detection tools and AI-content detectors. This paper proposes the idea of AI-resilient assignments maintaining academic integrity with product- and process-based evaluation approach. These AI-resilient assignments are similar to the open-book system, where they require human intelligence, independent thinking, and personal understanding to solve them correctly.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

RETHINKING ASSESSMENT: DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION IN THE AI ERA

This article re-examines the role of assessment within the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI), focusing specifically on differentiated instruction, and highlights the potential of AI to not only streamline the assessment process but also cultivate a more equitable and student-centered learning e...

H. Trinh · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

AI Personas: Can LLMs Replace Fieldwork in Experiential Learning?

The study centers on students participating in the Experiential Learning HEHI 303 course as part of the Certificate in Innovation Management in Contexts of Uncertainty at the American University of Beirut, who were unable to conduct fieldwork because of the war outbreak in Lebanon.

I. Elhajj, Aline Germani, Joanna Maria Farah et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Using Classroom Surveys to Align Grading Practices and Self-Directed Learning in the Age of AI

A context is established in which reflective classroom surveys can help teachers implement process-based grading structures to empower students in their growth as authentic learners instead of defaulting to passive users of AI.

Erik N. Powel · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

When AI Gets It Wrong: Conscious Competence Development through Student Design Reflections

This research explores the use of a latent Dirichlet allocation model to automatically classify students' design reflections, thereby improving the efficacy of their reviews, and advocates for professional engineering licensure bodies to modernize policies to encourage thoughtful, rigorous evaluation of AI models befor...

Brian Macdonald, Sister Libby Osgood, Christopher Power · 0 citations
Aug 2026

AI Literacy as Experimental Practice: Students as Investigators

A three-week midterm project embedded in an undergraduate “AI-for-all” course investigated whether AI literacy can be taught to undergrads, and shows any user how to test an AI system rather than trust it blindly.

A. Shehu, Adonyas Ababu, Asma Akbary et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Generative Artificial Intelligence, Perceived Effort, and Critical Thinking: Evidence from an Experimental Study with ChatGPT in Higher Education

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT in solving a case study with quantitative questions and seeks to compare the performance of students who use the tool with those who do not, from formulating instructions to validating or assessing the results.

Emilio Velasco-Bartolomé, Sofía Ruiz-Campo · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.