Skip to content

Principled Thoughts for Latent Recursive LLM Systems

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 54 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

REST (REpresentation-Supervised Thoughts), a training objective that turns four properties of a valid thought representation into differentiable losses added to CE, instantiate in latent single-agent and multi-agent systems, without architectural changes or added parameters at inference.

Abstract

Large language models can reason in continuous space instead of decoded text, by recurring on their own hidden states or by passing those states between agents, while training supervises only the Cross-Entropy (CE) of the final decoded answer and does not constrain the thought. Theoretical and empirical analyses establish and confirm four failures of CE-only training that lead to a lower probability of the correct answer such as collapsing thoughts across distinct questions and retaining irrelevant information. We introduce REST (REpresentation-Supervised Thoughts), a training objective that turns four properties of a valid thought representation (causality, minimality, separability, and stability) into differentiable losses added to CE. We instantiate it in latent single-agent and multi-agent systems, without architectural changes or added parameters at inference. Across 7 benchmarks spanning mathematics, science, medicine, and code generation, with the same training data, compute, and latent budget, REST increases accuracy over CE-only training across agent settings and model sizes by up to 7.5 percentage points and convergence on a final answer by 30\%. Furthermore, REST thoughts encode more of what is required to achieve the correct answer, and decoding them better recovers the intended output of the agent, which makes latent communication easier to interpret. Project Website: https://fard-lab.github.io/REST

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Latent Recurrent Thoughts: Recurrent Refinement of Proposed Latents for Reasoning with Frozen LLMs

Latent Recurrent Thoughts substantially outperforms prior frozen-decoder continuous-space reasoning methods under an identical decoder, prompt, data, and training budget, and outperforms non-thinking-mode chain-of-thought prompting on the same backbone at a small fraction of its inference compute.

Zhao-Xing Chen, Jie Fu · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

The Dynamics of Continuous Mixture Collapse in Language Models

This work studies why pretrained language models often fail to preserve mixtures of many components and shows that exact preservation generally requires context-dependent correction, whose required dimensionality can grow with the number of components.

Ali Backour · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

A Model with No Head and Many Thoughts

This work introduces Soft Latent Thinking, a method that replaces the LM head during reasoning with a lightweight projector, enabling autoregressive rollout in embedding space where reasoning steps remain continuous rather than tokenized.

N. Koriagin, Yaroslav Aksenov, George Bredis et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

A*-Thought-V2: Efficient Latent Reasoning via Geometric Dynamics of LLM

A*-Thought-V2 is presented, a geometric dynamics of LLM guided framework that models CoT as a hidden-state trajectory and replaces hard deletion with an explicit-implicit interleaved latent architecture that reflects broader soft targets that encourage richer step-level feature learning.

Xiao-An Xu, Si-Yuan Liu, Shuo Wang et al. · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Dyad: Extending Large Language Models with Native Typed Decision-Making

Dyad is introduced, an architecture that augments a pretrained LLM with an environment-conditioned action encoder that embeds each candidate action description in parallel, then scores these embeddings against the LLM's internal state to yield a distribution over typed actions.

Yundaichuan Zhan, Wei-Shi Wang, Wen-Biao Liu et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.