Skip to content

LoopICL: Looping a single transformer block to solve tabular tasks

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 50 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

LoopICL, a looped transformer whose core design decouples parameter count from computational depth, is introduced, a looped transformer whose recurrent design enables users to also trade off inference cost and performance, providing a resource-aware TFM.

Abstract

Tabular foundation models using in-context learning have recently surpassed gradient-boosted trees on predictive tabular tasks. However, recent mechanistic insights suggest that parameters in these models are largely redundant. We introduce LoopICL, a looped transformer whose core design decouples parameter count from computational depth. LoopICL consists of a single block, processing data through two coupled streams: a cell stream capturing per-cell feature representations and a row stream capturing in-context example representations, jointly refined through within-column and cross-column attention. During pre-training, we vary loop counts, allowing the block to be unrolled for a varying number of iterations at test-time and use a learned exit-gate to automatically exit. In its standard setting, LoopICL performs competitively with TabICLv2 on TabArena and TALENT at the same computational cost (FLOPs), while using nearly 90% fewer parameters. Furthermore, its recurrent design enables users to also trade off inference cost and performance, providing a resource-aware TFM.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Looped Transformers as Optimizers

Looped Transformers provide a parameter-efficient approach to depth scaling by repeatedly applying shared Transformer blocks. Recent reasoning models have likewise highlighted the value of scaling test-time computation through longer computation trajectories. However, the principles for designing effective loop transit...

Yu-Long Huang, Chen Jiang, Zhan-Peng Zhou et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

LiFT: Loop Flow Transformers

We introduce Loop Flow Transformers (LiFT), a family of looped generative models that scales computation by repeatedly applying a shared Diffusion Transformer (DiT) core, with only light changes to the standard architecture. Rather than asking every recurrent step for the final prediction, LiFT trains each step with a...

Mohammad Mahdi Derakhshani, P. Curvo, G. Burghouts et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Decoding Looped Transformers Better for (Almost) Free

Looped Transformers achieve parameter efficiency by repeatedly executing a shared block across recurrent loops. Each loop yields an intermediate representation decodable for the same next token, yet standard decoding discards earlier states. Because earlier loops embody less computation, recurrence inherently supplies...

Weihao Liu, Huangjie Zheng, Tian-Rong Chen et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Looping Beyond Twice: A Scalable Recipe for Looped Mixture-of-Experts

Looped Transformers introduce recurrent depth as a new scaling axis for LLMs: by repeatedly applying shared Transformer blocks, they increase effective depth without increasing parameter count. However, the benefits of looping remain unclear for large MoE LLMs under FLOPs-matched comparisons. The main reason is that th...

Di He, Peng-Xiang Li, Da Chang et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Improving Test-Time Scaling with Adaptive Looped Transformers

Looped transformers have demonstrated promising parameter efficiency by reusing layers for latent computation. Prior studies compare looped and non-looped models at matched parameters or per-token FLOPs. However, to the best of our knowledge, whether looping improves test-time scaling as outputs grow longer remains und...

Yi-Chen You, Tianyu Fu, Ao-Song Feng et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Allocating Recurrent Compute in Looped Language Models

Results show that the benefits of recurrent depth can be retained without repeatedly executing the dense FFN, and view recurrence as repeated composition of a state update and argue that an application is valuable when it exposes a new cross-position influence direction that remains observable at the task readout.

Ruhai Lin, Yi-Yang Guo, Ruiming Zhu et al. · 4 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.