2026· IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications· Vol 25, pp. 20623-20638· 0 citations· 60 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
A nonconvex energy cost minimization problem is introduced by considering a user-specific energy cost ratio coefficient that explicitly balances UE-AP energy consumption according to heterogeneous device energy states and a double-loop framework combining successive convex approximation and alternating direction method of multipliers is developed.
Abstract
Integrated sensing, communication, and computation (ISCC) enables next-generation wireless networks to perform environmental perception while processing massive data under stringent quality-of-service (QoS) requirements. Energy consumption is a crucial indicator for the ISCC system design. However, accounting for energy heterogeneity in ISCC system design is an open problem. Specifically, battery-constrained user equipments (UEs) and energy-abundant access points (APs) require fundamentally different energy allocation strategies based on device computational capabilities, battery states, and QoS constraints. In this paper, we introduce a nonconvex energy cost minimization problem by considering a user-specific energy cost ratio coefficient that explicitly balances UE-AP energy consumption according to heterogeneous device energy states. To efficiently address this problem, a double-loop framework combining successive convex approximation and alternating direction method of multipliers is also developed. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed scheme significantly outperforms the fixed offloading baselines (full offloading, full local and half offloading) in terms of the total energy cost. In particular, the proposed scheme achieves up to $25-47.6\%$ energy cost reduction at moderate latency constraints over fixed offloading baselines, thereby supporting time-sensitive applications. Moreover, this work provides an effective solution for energy-efficient and QoS-aware 6G ISCC systems serving diverse devices with conflicting energy priorities.
Integrated sensing, communication, and computing (ISCC) technology significantly improves spectrum efficiency and reduces hardware costs by unifying the functionalities of sensing, communication, and computation. However, the degradation of wireless link quality caused by obstacles may lead to severe offloading latency...
Yingsheng Peng, Jin-Bei Zhang, Jingpu Duan et al.· IEEE Transactions on Green C...· 0 citations
This paper investigates an integrated sensing, communication, and computing network enabled by joint beamforming and cooperative device-to-device (D2D) and mobile edge computing (MEC) offloading. In the considered system, multiple full-duplex integrated sensing and communication devices perform target sensing while off...
Tao Jiang, Ming Jin, Qing-Hua Guo et al.· IEEE Transactions on Wireles...· 0 citations
Validation of the APG algorithm's resilience revealed that it outperformed benchmark algorithms in terms of energy efficiency and execution time, demonstrating its usefulness for challenging optimization tasks, particularly those involving bursty communication.
K. A. Bonsu, Ebenezer Baidoo Baidoo Bediako, K. Darkwah et al.· Applied Mathematics and Stat...· 0 citations
Reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-assisted wireless-powered communication networks (WPCNs) introduce a new degree of freedom: the same passive beamforming array can concentrate the downlink energy toward harvesting devices and simultaneously shape the uplink interference environment. In this paper, we study a sy...
Yongjie Li, Jing Shen, Jizhao Lu et al.· 2026 8th International Confe...· 0 citations
This research is among the first to employ MARL to this extent, and it offers an end-to-end solution that combines cellular, Wi-Fi, and device-to-device (D2D) communications and considers practical network environments like user mobility and channel conditions.
Nabeel Abdolrazagh Yaseen Alrashedi, Rasool Sadeghi, Wael Hussein Zayer Al-Lamy et al.· Journal of universal compute...· 0 citations
A network energy-efficiency (EE) maximization framework for the uplink of acell-free massive MIMO with wireless fronthaul, jointly optimizing the integrated access and fronthaul (IAF) resource split, the adaptive per-AP quantization resolution, and the fronthaul powers, and treating the time-division and frequency-divi...
Özlem Tuğfe Demir· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.