Jul 2026· Pubmedia Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris· Vol 3, pp. 1-14· 0 citations· 6 references
TL;DR
The study concludes that chat-based AI supports students in essay writing, but its effectiveness depends on how students regulate its use across SRL phases, including the forethought, performance, and self-reflection phases.
Abstract
This study explores how undergraduate EFL students use chat-based AI tools in essay writing through the lens of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL), focusing on the forethought, performance, and self-reflection phases. A qualitative research design was used, and data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 12 English Education students selected through purposive sampling based on their experience using chat-based AI tools. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis with both deductive and inductive coding. The findings show that in the forethought phase, students mainly set simple goals such as completing essays quickly, getting good grades, and meeting academic requirements. They also used AI to help generate ideas and organize essay structure when they had difficulties. In the performance phase, students used chat-based AI for brainstorming ideas, improving grammar and vocabulary, and developing their writing. However, they did not fully depend on AI output and often rewrote and checked the content to maintain originality and clarity. In the self-reflection phase, students viewed AI as helpful for improving writing speed, ideas, and language quality, but they also expressed concerns about overuse and dependence. Despite this, most students reported improvements in their writing skills and planned to continue using AI carefully. The study concludes that chat-based AI supports students in essay writing, but its effectiveness depends on how students regulate its use across SRL phases. The findings show that students are starting to apply self-regulated learning strategies, although their writing is still strongly influenced by task completion goals and academic demands.
Examining a four-process GenAI cycle reveals two distinct metacognitive regulation styles: Exploratory-Simplification and Systematic-Methodical, which show that students use combinations of strategies across the AI-SRL cycle.
Maria A. Perifanou, Anastasios A. Economides· Journal of educational compu...· 0 citations
It is suggested that ChatGPT functions as a supportive revision tool rather than a replacement for students' writing and provide implications for integrating generative AI into English writing instruction while promoting AI literacy and responsible AI use in higher education.
Rian Erlangga, Ratna Andhika Mahaputri, Haris Budiana· Journal of Educational Manag...· 0 citations
It is suggested that educators should transition from restricting AI tools to teaching AI literacy, and guiding students to responsibly use and evaluate AI texts will support the development of their independent cognitive skills alongside modern educational technology.
Muhammad Wajihuddin bin Johari, Noran Nur Munira Khalili, Nur Zafirah Binti Zainol et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
Grammarly is a useful complementary tool that should support, not replace, instructors’ guidance in academic writing and integrating Grammarly into EFL writing instruction with appropriate pedagogical support may help improve students’ academic writing skills and promote learner autonomy.
A “Dialectical AI-Scaffolding Framework” is proposed designed to shift ChatGPT from a product-generation tool to an intellectual sparring partner, ensuring that GenAI advances rather than compromises critical thinking in ESL pedagogy.
E. Raju, E. Namratha· International Journal of Eng...· 0 citations
It is suggested that ChatGPT can support drafting and self-monitoring during the performance phase when it is used with teacher guidance, focused prompts, and clear revision tasks.
Tuong Thi Xuan Thu, Giao Dang· Journal of Social Science an...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.