Skip to content
Open access

Treatment effects of the Sander II appliance in class II therapy : A cephalometric, retrospective case-control study.

Jul 2026 · Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie · 0 citations · 17 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The S‑II appliance effectively corrected overjet and class II molar relation by mainly skeletal effects (ventral displacement of the mandible, maxillary growth inhibition) and minimal dental effects (reclination of upper incisors).

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the mechanism of class II correction using the Sander II (S-II) appliance.

Materials And Methods

In a retrospective case-control study, 102 class II patients (mean 10.46 years) treated with the S‑II appliance were compared to 64 untreated class II patients. Skeletal, dental, and occlusal parameters were evaluated using lateral cephalometric radiographs before (T0) and after treatment (T1). For the quantification of sagittal changes, the Pancherz sagittal occlusion analysis was applied. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA; significance level p < 0.05) and G*power (Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany).

Results

The annual treatment effects of the S‑II appliance (mean diff. of ∆ = T1 - T0 between both groups per year) were: a) sagittal correction of the skeletal class II relationship by -1.07 mm/year [(∆pog/OLp) - (∆ss/OLp)], achieved by anterior displacement of the mandible by 0.41 mm/year (∆pog/OLp) and maxillary growth restriction by -0.66 mm/year (∆ss/OLp). b) Retroinclination of the upper incisors by -0.75°/year (∆U1-NSL), -0.68°/year (∆U1-NA) and -0.68 mm/year [(∆is/OLp) - (∆ss/OLp)]. c) Maintenance of lower incisor inclination [(∆ii/OLp) - ( ∆pog/OLp): -0.18 mm/year]. d) Overjet correction by 1.58 mm/year (100%) as a result of 1.07 mm/year skeletal (68%) and 0.50 mm/year dental effects (32%). e) Molar correction of 0.90 mm/year (100%) mainly due to skeletal effects during mixed dentition.

Conclusion

In this study, the S‑II appliance effectively corrected overjet and class II molar relation by mainly skeletal effects (ventral displacement of the mandible, maxillary growth inhibition) and minimal dental effects (reclination of upper incisors). Functional treatment with the S‑II appliance may facilitate later orthodontic therapy as class II can be corrected without lower incisor proclination.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Temporal changes in treatment selection criteria for skeletal Class III: a comparison of surgical orthodontic and orthodontic camouflage treatments

Advances in orthodontic treatment mechanics, particularly the introduction of particularly the increasing use of skeletal anchorage, may have altered the boundary between surgical orthodontic and orthodontic camouflage treatments in patients with skeletal Class III. This study explored temporal changes in treatme...

Yurika Mizoguchi, Chie Tachiki, Yuki Iijima et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Surgery-First and Orthodontic-First Protocols for Correcting Skeletal Class II Malocclusion.

Both SFA and OFA achieve comparable long-term skeletal stability in skeletal class II patients and while SFA significantly reduces the total treatment duration, it is associated with longer operative times and a higher incidence of minor dental injuries.

Xin-Yu Xu, Yuxin Li, Ling Wu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Dec 2025

Effects of functional jaw orthopedics with maxillary expansion on palatal morphology, mandibular growth, airway dimensions, and oral function in Class II malocclusion: A randomized controlled trial

Both appliances promoted mandibular growth and increased oral space, but did not significantly influence the measured upper airway widths.

Hana Cukaj Ademi, Alexei Zhurov, Maja Ovsenik et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Hard- and soft-tissue changes after adult Class II Division 1 orthodontic treatment: a retrospective CBCT-based observational study

In non-growing adults, treatment was accompanied by predominantly dentoalveolar correction and by coupled soft-tissue change that was maintained at 1 year at group level, no mean change exceeding the error of the method.

Zhenqi Zhao, Yun Gu, Xiao-Lei Tang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.