Jul 2026· Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie· 0 citations· 17 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The S‑II appliance effectively corrected overjet and class II molar relation by mainly skeletal effects (ventral displacement of the mandible, maxillary growth inhibition) and minimal dental effects (reclination of upper incisors).
Abstract
Objectives
To investigate the mechanism of class II correction using the Sander II (S-II) appliance.
Materials And Methods
In a retrospective case-control study, 102 class II patients (mean 10.46 years) treated with the S‑II appliance were compared to 64 untreated class II patients. Skeletal, dental, and occlusal parameters were evaluated using lateral cephalometric radiographs before (T0) and after treatment (T1). For the quantification of sagittal changes, the Pancherz sagittal occlusion analysis was applied. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA; significance level p < 0.05) and G*power (Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany).
Results
The annual treatment effects of the S‑II appliance (mean diff. of ∆ = T1 - T0 between both groups per year) were: a) sagittal correction of the skeletal class II relationship by -1.07 mm/year [(∆pog/OLp) - (∆ss/OLp)], achieved by anterior displacement of the mandible by 0.41 mm/year (∆pog/OLp) and maxillary growth restriction by -0.66 mm/year (∆ss/OLp). b) Retroinclination of the upper incisors by -0.75°/year (∆U1-NSL), -0.68°/year (∆U1-NA) and -0.68 mm/year [(∆is/OLp) - (∆ss/OLp)]. c) Maintenance of lower incisor inclination [(∆ii/OLp) - ( ∆pog/OLp): -0.18 mm/year]. d) Overjet correction by 1.58 mm/year (100%) as a result of 1.07 mm/year skeletal (68%) and 0.50 mm/year dental effects (32%). e) Molar correction of 0.90 mm/year (100%) mainly due to skeletal effects during mixed dentition.
Conclusion
In this study, the S‑II appliance effectively corrected overjet and class II molar relation by mainly skeletal effects (ventral displacement of the mandible, maxillary growth inhibition) and minimal dental effects (reclination of upper incisors). Functional treatment with the S‑II appliance may facilitate later orthodontic therapy as class II can be corrected without lower incisor proclination.
Advances in orthodontic treatment mechanics, particularly the introduction of particularly the increasing use of skeletal anchorage, may have altered the boundary between surgical orthodontic and orthodontic camouflage treatments in patients with skeletal Class III. This study explored temporal changes in treatme...
Both SFA and OFA achieve comparable long-term skeletal stability in skeletal class II patients and while SFA significantly reduces the total treatment duration, it is associated with longer operative times and a higher incidence of minor dental injuries.
Xin-Yu Xu, Yuxin Li, Ling Wu et al.· The Journal of craniofacial...· 0 citations
In non-growing adults, treatment was accompanied by predominantly dentoalveolar correction and by coupled soft-tissue change that was maintained at 1 year at group level, no mean change exceeding the error of the method.
Zhenqi Zhao, Yun Gu, Xiao-Lei Tang et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations