The review shows that AI offers substantial potential for personalised learning, scalable feedback, administrative automation and curriculum innovation, but that effective integration requires transparent governance, educator training, reliable evidence, accessibility and a commitment to ethical and human-centred use.
Abstract
This article presents a scoping review of the emerging transformative role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education. Using a Population-Concept-Context (PCC) review design, we focus on the implications of AI for three major stakeholder groups: students, educators and institutions. Based on academic studies and grey literature from 2010 onwards, the review covers AI technologies, including machine learning, natural language processing, intelligent tutoring systems, learning analytics, chatbots and generative AI, and examines their pedagogical, administrative and ethical impacts. We analyse stakeholder demand, teaching and learning innovations, AI literacy education, institutional implementation barriers, data privacy, algorithmic bias, academic integrity and policy governance. The review shows that AI offers substantial potential for personalised learning, scalable feedback, administrative automation and curriculum innovation, but that effective integration requires transparent governance, educator training, reliable evidence, accessibility and a commitment to ethical and human-centred use. The article concludes with best-practice and policy recommendations for responsible AI implementation and adoption in higher education.
It is concluded that AI should complement educators rather than replace them and that responsible implementation supported by institutional policies, faculty development, and ethical guidelines is essential for sustainable educational transformation.
Jestin James M· International Journal of Tec...· 0 citations
A notable gap is identified between AI's theoretical potential and practical implementation in resource-constrained institutions, highlighting the need for evidence-based implementation frameworks, ethical guidelines, and inclusive design principles.
Zaffar Ahmad Nadaf, S. Jamal· Journal of Education Method...· 0 citations
The evidence indicates meaningful potential for personalization, timely feedback, accessibility and operational efficiency, but also identifies risks involving inaccurate output, academic integrity, algorithmic bias, data privacy, unequal access and insufficient faculty preparedness.
Husna Sultana, Irfan Ahmed, J. G· International journal of res...· 0 citations
The findings reveal that GenAI can effectively improve teaching efficacy, enable personalised learning experiences, and streamline assessment procedures, however, its implementation also draws attention to concerns regarding academic integrity, data privacy, algorithmic bias, and ethical governance.
Xi Bi· Exploring Science Academic C...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence is best understood as an amplifier of pedagogy, rather than a replacement for teachers or human judgment, and its benefits are conditional on AI literacy, transparent governance, and equitable access.
D. Bîrsan· Journal of Non-Formal and Di...· 0 citations
The study identifies a persistent fragmentation in existing research and proposes the Integrated Challenge Model for AI Curriculum Development (ICM-AI-CD), which conceptualizes AI integration as a dynamic socio-technical system comprising interdependent ethical-policy, pedagogical-design, and technical-institutional do...
Abdul Malik· Applied Business: Issues &am...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.