An interpretable three-stage machine learning framework integrating mRNA, microRNA, DNA methylation, copy number variation, and protein expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas that couples improved prognostic estimation with biological interpretability supporting multi-omics biomarker discovery in ovarian cancer.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is among the deadliest gynecologic malignancies, and its molecular heterogeneity limits accurate prognostic stratification. Although multi-omics approaches have improved predictive modeling, many prioritize predictive performance over biological interpretability, limiting their clinical translation. We developed an interpretable three-stage machine learning framework integrating mRNA, microRNA, DNA methylation, copy number variation, and protein expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Hierarchical feature selection was combined with a weighted ensemble of ElasticNet, ridge regression, support vector regression, XGBoost, and random forest models to estimate overall survival time in patients with ovarian cancer. Multi-omics integration outperformed every single-modality model, achieving a Pearson correlation of 0.752, a concordance index of 0.779, and a mean absolute error of 8.57 months between estimated and observed survival time, compared with 0.48 for the best single modality. The framework identified a 20-biomarker signature dominated by tumor-associated macrophage and complement genes. In an independent survival analysis, VSIG4 and CD163 remained significant after false discovery rate correction, and the signature raised the concordance index over clinical covariates alone from 0.615 to 0.686Enrichment analysis implicated PI3K-Akt, MAPK, focal adhesion, hypoxia, apoptosis, and p53 signaling pathways. This framework couples improved prognostic estimation with biological interpretability supporting multi-omics biomarker discovery in ovarian cancer.
This study demonstrates that multi-omics integration via machine learning enhances survival prediction and reveals actionable biomarkers in breast cancer and outperformed mutation-based models.
G. Mestrallet, Alexandre Pierga, P. Frémont et al.· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that assigning complementary roles to stacking multimodal information integration and bagging for prediction stabilization provides an effective and robust framework for multi-omics breast cancer prognosis, supporting the use of complementary ensemble paradigms for multimodal prediction in precision...
Reza Bozorgpour, Mohammadreza Soltany Sadrabadi· Clinical Cancer Bulletin· 0 citations
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains difficult to subtype using single omics layers. We conducted an exploratory investigation integrating reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) and DNA methylation data from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA)- pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) to assess the feasibility of multi-omics...
Shafiul Haque, D. Mathkor, M. Wahid et al.· Computational biology and ch...· 0 citations
Inter-patient heterogeneity complicates predicting treatment response in ovarian cancer (OC). We developed OMICS-FUSE, an early-fusion multi-omics predictive model integrating proteomic, transcriptomic, and methylomic data from OC patients, evaluated across five machine learning algorithms with SHapley Additive exPlana...
Jie Chen, Tianshi Mao, Yu Yang et al.· npj Digital Medicine· 0 citations
EZH2, CDK1, and AURKA constitute an internally validated prognostic risk signature in PCa that links cell cycle dysregulation to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and provides clinically actionable risk stratification and highlights candidate therapeutic targets in prostate cancer.
Gu-Quan Chen, Jie-Feng Zhang, Lin-Fu Zhao et al.· Frontiers in Genetics· 0 citations
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the malignant tumors with high incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Given the poor prognosis of patients with HCC, it is crucial to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying HCC development and to evaluate prognostic markers. Differential expression analysis followed by un...
Yu-Xian Liu, Xing-Jie Chen, Jun-Yuan Zhang et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.