An AI-assisted elicitation workflow that combines theory-guided script generation grounded in business goals with live support for topic coverage tracking and on-demand follow-up question generation is presented, positioning AI-assisted workflows as elicitation scaffolds for future studies.
Abstract
Requirements elicitation interviews require interviewers to balance topic coverage, active listening, and adaptive probing while responding to stakeholders in real time. Although prior work has explored AI support for isolated interviewing tasks, such as script generation and follow-up question generation, little is known about how integrated support affects the interview and what requirements artifacts emerge. Furthermore, script management---which helps the interviewer track topic coverage in real time and decide when to probe further---remains underexplored. This paper presents an AI-assisted elicitation workflow that combines theory-guided script generation grounded in business goals with live support for topic coverage tracking and on-demand follow-up question generation. We evaluate the workflow in a between-subjects quasi-experimental study comparing a no-training, AI-assisted condition with a training, AI-unassisted condition. Based on a rubric derived from elicitation best practices, the AI-generated scripts score higher than training-only scripts (92.8 vs. 74.8 out of 100). AI-assisted interviews cover fewer topics (9.6 vs. 14.5), cover more scripted questions (86% vs. 69%), ask more follow-ups per topic (3.43 vs. 1.15), and produce more refined goal models (lowest-level goal fraction 0.653 vs. 0.598). Participants find script management useful, rating topic tracking as the most useful workflow feature (86% agreement). Collectively, these results show that the AI-assisted condition is associated with a different interview trajectory and different elicited requirements than a training-only condition, positioning AI-assisted workflows as elicitation scaffolds for future studies.
Human expert interviews are valuable but often limited by slow recruitment, scarce expertise, and network-based sampling, especially for abstract human-automation topics requiring multidisciplinary input. This paper presents a persona-based LLM expert-interview pipeline for structuring expert knowledge before human inv...
Yi-Lei Fang, P. Bazilinskyy, Marieke H. Martens· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
Eliciting detailed and actionable software requirements from end-users is a critical phase in the iterative development of a software product or application. To ensure the feedback collected is detailed and actionable, software teams can leverage the laddering interview technique. While effective for ensuring granular...
Manjushree B. Aithal, Alexander Kotz, J. Mitchell· 0 citations
This study investigates the use of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), implemented using the LangChain framework, to support requirements elicitation activities in a requirements engineering course and indicates that while students perceived invited stakeholders as more realistic and engaging, the RAG-based automated...
Manal Binkhonain, O. Alharbi· Requirements Engineering· 0 citations
This work designed a tool called dBlocks with the following features: blocks to scope content, a context manager to edit context, and inline execution to verify code, and shows how human-centered design can guide the development of LLM-integrated tools.
A two-site qualitative study of Nigerian computing departments is reported, drawing on semi-structured interviews with students and academic staff and analysing the corpus through thematic analysis to characterise assessment practice under policy-light conditions, describing a persistent detection trap.
Kehinde D. Aruleba, Kike Ladipo, I. Sanusi et al.· International Computing Educ...· 0 citations
High-stakes advisory domains such as medical aesthetics, legal consultation, and educational planning exhibit a two-phase structure. The early phase requires empathetic elicitation and emotional support, and the late phase requires authoritative specialist judgment. Neither fully automated agents nor human junior consu...
Yu-Yan Chen· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.