Skip to content

Künstliche Intelligenz und die Grenzen menschlicher Autonomie

Abstract

From a philosophical perspective, this book considers whether artificial intelligence (AI) undermines human autonomy. Are we becoming increasingly controlled by external forces when AI makes decisions for us? Characteristics such as artificial autonomy, opacity and extreme speed could mark a tipping point at which self-determination gives way to external control. Responsibility becomes questionable when decisions are not transparent and human control is lost. At the same time, autonomous AI systems make it difficult to assess the truth and reliability of information. Ultimately, the book views AI as a form of 'smart power' that subtly—and often almost imperceptibly—influences our thinking, judgement and actions.

View source

Similar papers

2026

Künstliche Intelligenz und der Staat

The core of the study is the question of the extent to which the legislative use of AI is compatible with the unalterable core of the constitution.

Eva Beute · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

The Embodied Hijack: when Pleistocene minds meet disembodied artificial intelligence

The Embodied Hijack hypothesis is advanced, arguing that the goal is epistemic alignment — bringing how users interpret these systems into correspondence with what these systems actually are — and that this alignment is achieved through interface design rather than user education.

Sheila L. Macrine · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Superintelligent Zombies

It is suggested that if the view is right, a certain type of moral risk can be averted since researchers are unlikely to stumble into accidentally creating AI models that are conscious, and a new form of AI risk that arises from the view.

Justin Tiehen, A. Tubert · 0 citations

THE MADWYN PRINCIPLE

The Madwyn Das Madwyn, Principle Prinzip Conclusion, Principle Prinzip et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Infraestructuras deliberativas inteligentes

The proposed hypothesis is that AI, under certain conditions, has the potential to actively participate in deliberative processes within democratic frameworks, improving the quality of public debate, broadening inclusion, and strengthening collective rationality.

César Ruvalcaba-Gómez · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Fouls, Fumbles, and the Fate of Agents: Constitutivism and Imperfection

According to the legal-grammatical picture of constitutivism, the constitutive standards of a kind x carry an existential threat: abiding by them is necessary for being an x at all. But this seems to leave no room for defective x’s—the bad-x problem. A functional model escapes this problem, yet it fits structural rat...

Luca Ferrero · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.