TraceCompiler is presented, a skill-guided system that mines clusters of noisy agent traces and compiles them into executable, mostly deterministic workflows, and measures call reduction but not offline compilation cost, so it claims no net efficiency result.
Abstract
Tool-using language-model agents repeatedly rediscover procedures they have already executed, producing traces that mix reusable structure with retries, exploration, accidental ordering, and repeated lookups. We present TraceCompiler, a skill-guided system that mines clusters of noisy agent traces and compiles them into executable, mostly deterministic workflows. It admits an inter-tool dependency only when a consumer argument contains a value attributable uniquely to an earlier producer; every hard edge carries an auditable evidence tuple, and ambiguous relations are marked suspected and impose no ordering constraint. Bindings are classified as constants, user inputs, copied outputs, transforms, or residual LLM decisions. On T1, a mechanized form of the rule recovers producer-consumer dependencies at 0.928 precision and 0.943 recall over 15,775 def-use edges of its training split, against 0.711 F1 for adjacency and 0.712 for a frequency-thresholded directly-follows measure on identical data; the compiler skill run blind reaches 0.992 on 250 of those edges. On AppWorld we replay released trajectories in the deterministic simulator to recover masked return values and measure the rule against 563 token edges at 0.993 precision - a self-consistency check, since replay injects tokens by a related heuristic. We compile two recurring intents: a Venmo money-request intent reduces 34 observed API calls to 11 runtime calls and, under leave-one-out execution against the benchmark's own state tests, passes 15 of 21, the failing fold escalating rather than acting because its required branch was never observed; and a Spotify/Todoist intent the compiler correctly refuses to compile, because an irreversible side effect is under-determined. We measure call reduction but not offline compilation cost, so we claim no net efficiency result.
SKILLTRACE is presented, a multi-trace provenance auditing framework for LLM-agent skill reuse that represents the Operational Trace as a Skill Operational Graph (SOG) that captures activation, procedure, and resource-flow structure.
Jia-Luo Chen, Minghe Wang, Lingqi Jiang et al.· 0 citations
This work presents StructureClaw, an artifact-centered workbench in which LLM agents operate through governed engineering skills, typed tools, shared artifact state, and local analysis backends, together with StructureClaw-Bench, an executable benchmark of 150 controlled scenarios spanning standard workflows, interacti...
Sizhong Qin, Yi Gu, Yao Jiang et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
A telemetry-to-episode construction method instantiated as BTS-AgentBench is presented, which normalizes BTS metadata and raw histories into a read-only tool store, compiles static tasks with tool-derived gold answers and evidence, and lifts retained tasks into typed, bounded operator-facing episodes.
ARBIGRAPH is introduced, a benchmark generator for evaluating whether tool-assisted language agents can retain, update, compose, and discard task-relevant context across extended reasoning workflows, and shows that ARBIGRAPH exposes failures that are not visible from single-task evaluation alone.
Pavel Golikov, E. Opryshko, Gennady Pekhimenko et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
SyntheticAgentTraceQA is proposed, an execution- first framework for generating scalable supervision data for tool- augmented agents and shows that execution-grounded supervision improves tool execution behavior, reference-trace agreement, and answer-generation performance on the evaluated tasks.
Hafsa Ouajdi, Francesco Giannuzzo, Alaa Boukhary et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation· ⚡1
LLM-based code generation fails when correctness depends on execution-dependent coupling: the meaning of one routine is defined by the runtime behavior of another, a relationship that cannot be resolved from textual descriptions alone. This limitation, which we call static binding, is not confined to explicitly coupled...
Gnaneswar Villuri, Hashmath Shaik, Alex Doboli· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.