Learning from incidents is a cornerstone of occupational safety risk management, especially in high-risk industrial sectors. Incident databases support this process by collecting records that describe the causes, dynamics, and consequences of adverse events. However, these databases largely rely on unstructured textual narratives, which limits systematic analysis and the translation of learned lessons into effective preventive actions. This paper focuses on the iron and steel industry and presents an analysis pipeline supported by Large Language Models (LLMs) for extracting, synthesising, and structuring information from two major incident databases: the U.S. OSHA database and the French ARIA database. Relevant records were selected using industry classification codes and pre-processed to harmonise terminology, normalise information fields, remove duplicates, and manage multilingual content. Within a human-in-the-loop framework, LLMs were used to identify critical occupational risk scenarios, characterise them in terms of frequency and severity, and derive prevention and risk mitigation measures structured according to the ISO 45001 hierarchy of controls. Eight critical scenarios were identified and subsequently validated and refined by safety experts from the steel industry. Quantitative analysis identified point-of-operation machinery and load handling as the most frequent scenarios, while confined spaces and high-energy events exhibited disproportionate severity and lethality. The results demonstrated how LLM-supported approaches can enhance learning from incidents by transforming large volumes of heterogeneous narrative data into a traceable, expert-validated knowledge base that supports hazard identification, risk assessment and management, and continuous improvement in high-risk industrial environments.
This study proposes a lightweight Natural Language Processing (NLP) pipeline to automatically classify the primary cause of major accidents using the European eMARS database and shows that Word2Vec+SVM provides the strongest and most stable baseline on the full labelled set, while SBERT performance improves markedly un...
Valerio Cozzani, B. Fabiano, G. Reniers et al.· 0 citations
Results suggest that current public reporting can identify the type of error that occurred, but is limited in explaining why it occurred, and suggest that current public reporting can identify the type of error that occurred, but is limited in explaining why it occurred.
Saroja Roy Grandhi, Jeremiah D. Still· Proceedings of the Human Fac...· 0 citations
Job Safety Analysis (JSA) and pre-task planning can benefit from prior incident records, yet historical accident data is often stored as unstructured narratives that are difficult to consult at the point of planning. A novel framework centered on large language models (LLMs) for highway construction safety reporting an...
M. Smetana, Trevor Neece, Lev Khazanovich· 0 citations
This work designs a workflow that prompts LLMs to output elements of an influence diagram and resolves issues through verification and regeneration and applies LAMDA to discussions by groups of disease control experts on a hypothetical pandemic to demonstrate its real-world applicability.
DGEval is introduced, the first benchmark for evaluating LLM knowledge of IMDG Amendment 42-24, and shows that LLMs may support compliance tasks, particularly structured DGL lookups with web search, but unreliability in operational areas and regulatory-text recall means human oversight and authoritative source verifica...
Alexander S Thomas, Hubert P. H. Shum, Darren Nellis et al.· 0 citations
This paper articulates an integrated nationwide framework featuring federated data interoperability, risk-calibrated algorithmic hygiene standards, mandatory prospective evaluation protocols, and a phased evolution toward binding administrative regulation.
A. Alao· Magna Scientia Advanced Rese...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.