Integrated Gradients (IG) analysis shows that the model learns physically coherent spatial behavior, highlighting grid cells near the outlet and identifying dominant meteorological drivers of peak runoff events, and outline a pathway toward interpretable, large‐scale streamflow prediction.
Abstract
Data‐driven rainfall–runoff models have advanced rapidly, yet the majority of large‐scale applications still rely on lumped inputs that smooth out spatial variability in precipitation, temperature, and landscape properties. This simplification can introduce substantial biases in flood peaks, hydrograph timing, and water balance estimates. Here, we develop a deep learning framework that ingests spatially distributed (gridded) meteorological forcings and is evaluated across 921 catchments in North America using the CAMELS‐SPAT data set. We compare two strategies for fusing spatial and temporal information, namely a spatial‐to‐temporal (S2T) architecture and a temporal‐to‐spatial (T2S) architecture, and assess the added value of gridded catchment attributes and finer spatial resolutions. The T2S approach consistently achieves the best performance, increasing median Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) from 0.60 (lumped baseline) to 0.65 and Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE) from 0.63 to 0.69, with NSE improvements observed in 75.4% of catchments. Performance gains are consistent across catchment sizes and aridity regimes, with enhanced skill in low‐flow, high‐flow, and peak timing representations. Integrated Gradients (IG) analysis shows that the model learns physically coherent spatial behavior, highlighting grid cells near the outlet and identifying dominant meteorological drivers of peak runoff events. These results demonstrate the practical value of spatially distributed forcings for data‐driven hydrologic modeling and outline a pathway toward interpretable, large‐scale streamflow prediction.
Streamflow prediction is essential for water resources management and flood mitigation but remains challenging in large basins due to spatial heterogeneity. Machine learning (ML) models have been widely applied to streamflow prediction, typically relying on explicit routing modules, whereas the potential of pure ML mod...
Qiang Yu, Li-Guang Jiang, Shuo Wang et al.· Geophysical Research Letters· 0 citations
Hydrological modeling across heterogeneous watersheds remains a key challenge for water resource assessment in regions with strong hydroclimatic gradients. This study presents and evaluates the Chilean Hydrological Model for Climate Change (MHiDROC3) that integrates hydrometeorological and geospatial inputs, data imput...
E. Duarte, Paul Sandoval-Quilodrán, Aried Lozano et al.· Hydrology· 0 citations
Groundwater quality assessment in hyper arid aquifers is often limited by sparse monitoring, incomplete hydraulic data, and difficulty separating prior hydrochemical conditions from short‐term meteorological forcing. This study develops a hydrochemically grounded and machine learning framework with internal transferabi...
Abdullah A. Alsumaiei, Mosaed S. Alrashidi· Water environment research· 0 citations
Understanding regional hydroclimatic variability and its drivers is essential to anticipate the impacts of climate change on water resources and sustainability. Yet, considerable uncertainty remains in the simulation of the coupled land–atmosphere water and energy cycles, largely due to structural model limitations,...
J. Roque, F. P. Da Silva Lopes, J. Giles et al.· International Journal of Cli...· 1 citation
Accurate hydrologic modeling in data-scarce mountainous regions remains challenging due to strong climatic variability, complex topography, and limited ground data. This study evaluates the influence of four precipitation inputs on the performance of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool Plus (SWAT+) model in the monsoo...
Pasquinel de la Fraga, E. Vivoni, Yalina Montecelos-Zamora et al.· Frontiers in Water· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.