A T2T Benchmark Reveals How Reference Choice Shapes Human Genome Interpretation
TL;DR
It is found that reference choice substantially influences genome interpretation: ancestry-matched linear T2T references provided the most faithful representation of individual genomic variation and enabled more accurate genome reconstruction than unmatched linear, diploid and graph-based references.
Abstract
The completion of telomere-to-telomere (T2T) human genomes has expanded the accessible landscape of human genetic variation, yet benchmark resources remain limited to conventional high-confidence regions defined by existing reference frameworks. Here, we generated a near-perfect diploid T2T genome (T2T-LIN) from a Chinese individual and established assembly-based truth sets by comparison with T2T-YAO, an ancestry-matched near-perfect T2T reference genome. The benchmark showed a heterozygous/homozygous SNV ratio of ~2, consistent with expectations under Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, and enabled genome-wide evaluation of reference-dependent biases. We found that reference choice substantially influences genome interpretation: ancestry-matched linear T2T references provided the most faithful representation of individual genomic variation and enabled more accurate genome reconstruction than unmatched linear, diploid and graph-based references. Benchmarking previously inaccessible repetitive and structurally complex regions revealed substantial limitations of current variant callers that were masked by conventional metrics. The T2T-LIN and YAO-LIN benchmarks establish a T2T-era framework for evaluating reference-dependent genome interpretation and variant discovery across nearly the complete human genome.