In this author-meets-critics discussion, Sanjay Lal presents the main ideas of his book Violence, Nonviolence, and Moral Worth, arguing that nonviolence meets violence along a continuum where there are degrees of greater and lesser examples, including a wide range of examples that combine both tendencies. Lal defines nonviolence in terms of three components that emphasize attitudes over actions: (1) a willingness to not harm others, (2) wanting to facilitate the well-being of others, (3) and not sacrificing one’s own moral worth. Three critics share their praises and concerns: Predrag Cicovacki challenges Lal to be more specific on the definition of moral worth, on the relationship between violence and nonviolence, and on the account that he gives for value theory and value conflict. Jennifer Kling asks if beliefs can serve as pre-existing grounds for action, if reconceptualizations of pop culture are bound to any limits, and if there are good reasons for assuming that all people are approachable. Danielle Poe asks what it means to reconceptualize popular culture as an approachable resource of nonviolent insight. Answering these questions, Lal reflects on what it means to be inspired by Gandhi’s example.
This article offers a supportive but critical engagement with Nicole Hassoun’s method for determining the content of the minimally good life. Against the dangers of both homogenising, paternalistic objectivism and capricious, uncritical subjectivism, Hassoun develops an account grounded in the second-person perspecti...
George Boss, Sophie Harbour· Res Publica· 0 citations
The article takes as its starting point a recent book by the Flemish philosopher Farah Focquaert, in which she questions the idea that agents can be blamed for their unlawful actions. In line with other free will skeptics, Focquaert argues that a scientific (deterministic) worldview implies that individuals lack the...
P. De Witte· Tijdschrift voor Omgevingsre...· 0 citations
Professor Hans-Hermann Hoppe gave a public speech that is filled with errors, misrepresentations, and fallacies. He takes on several main subjects: monarchism, Israel, the Frankfurt School, Donald Trump, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and Javier Milei. This author views all three through the eyeglasses of libertarianism and misu...
Walter E. Block, Allen Gindler, Alan G. Futerman· MEST Journal· 0 citations
This article proposes to expand the conventional concept of nonmaleficence to add the obligation and the goal to avoid harm to the medical relationship and poses these relational obligations in prohibitory form because optimal clinical relationships remain context dependent, varying by setting and condition.
C. Crenner, S. Bird· Journal of Clinical Ethics· 0 citations
Entanglements of power and individual and collective commitments remain persistent issues for evaluation's potential impact. Dominant approaches have long operated hegemonically, privileging singular ways of knowing. Thus, concentrating epistemic authority in ways that silence community knowledge traditions and reprodu...
R. Acevedo· American Journal of Evaluati...· 0 citations
The study is a critical survey that analyzes the theatrical interventions of Yousif Al-Ani and Wole Soyinka in terms of the public intellectuals in The Key- المفتاح (1968) and A Play of Giants (1984), respectively, which has looked at each author separately but hardly in relation to one another, by applying a qualitati...
A. Saeed· مجلة واسط للعلوم الانسانية· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.