A heterogeneity-robust orthogonal score is constructed that restores $\sqrt{N}$ inference on the fixed, learner-invariant target at no efficiency cost, and a Hausman-type diagnostic and identification-robust confidence sets are provided.
Abstract
Instrumental-variables estimation increasingly pools many or high-dimensional instruments into a single machine-learned first stage, with rich controls partialled out. The resulting estimand, the partialled-out IV coefficient built from any signal of the instruments, is a signal-weighted average of the heterogeneous effects, which gives an opaque first stage a precise structural meaning. The average is convex whenever a covariance-monotonicity condition holds, and we provide a microfoundation for that condition based on vector monotonicity. With a learned signal, however, the usual debiased moment is not Neyman-orthogonal, and its first-order bias is a drift toward the learner's own signal-weighted average, so naive inference remains valid only for that learner-dependent target. We construct a heterogeneity-robust orthogonal score that restores $\sqrt{N}$ inference on the fixed, learner-invariant target at no efficiency cost, and provide a Hausman-type diagnostic and identification-robust confidence sets.
It is proved that PROBE is $\delta$-PAC and attains the known-correlation oracle sample complexity up to a constant multiplicative factor and a constant additive calibration cost and the guarantee extends to the $(\epsilon,\delta)$-PAC setting under minimal changes to the algorithm.
This paper develops double/debiased machine learning inference for low-dimensional SAR parameters when the spatial interaction operator is learned flexibly from potentially endogenous characteristics.
This study proposes a formal, computationally efficient nonparametric omnibus test for treatment-effect heterogeneity that is compatible with a broad class of estimators, including modern machine-learning methods and is illustrated using two empirical applications on retirement savings and trade liberalization.
Elia Lapenta, Anthony Strittmatter, Pedro Vergara Merino· 0 citations
Most empirical economists have encountered the warning that instrumental variables can be “weak,” but the underlying issues—what makes an instrument weak, why weakness distorts inference, and what to do about it—are less widely understood. This article offers an accessible introduction to the weak instruments problem f...
David S. Lee, Jack R. Porter· Journal of Economic Perspect...· 0 citations
In fixed-effect regressions with many groups, fixed effects can absorb most identifying variation, leaving a handful of observations to carry what remains. When variation is this concentrated, conventional $t$-tests can reject a true null more than half the time, and any fixed critical value is either invalid or so con...
The instrumental variable (IV) method is widely used to infer causal effects in observational studies with unmeasured confounding, but invalid instruments can compromise both population identification and finite-sample inference. This paper studies linear IV models with multiple endogenous treatments and possibly inval...
Ziwei Mei, Qingliang Fan, Zijian Guo· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.