Skip to content
Review

Can you trust the algorithm? A clinical exploration of AI models in perioperative care

Jul 2026 · BMJ Innovations · 0 citations · 12 references

TL;DR

A narrative conceptual review of four commonly encountered AI model types: random forests, support vector machines, convolutional neural networks and large language models is presented, exploring their clinical applications, interpretability, limitations and relevance to perioperative and surgical settings.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly influencing perioperative care by enhancing decision support, resource management, documentation, image analysis and patient safety. This article presents a narrative conceptual review of four commonly encountered AI model types: random forests, support vector machines, convolutional neural networks and large language models. It explores their clinical applications, interpretability, limitations and relevance to perioperative and surgical settings. Particular emphasis is placed on model explainability, evaluation metrics such as accuracy, F1 score and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, hallucination risk and the challenges associated with opaque ‘black box’ systems, including non-interpretable algorithmic frameworks. The discussion is contextualised within the UK’s regulatory and governance frameworks, including the National Health Service Digital clinical safety standards, Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency requirements, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence evaluation tiers and data protection under UK General Data Protection Regulation. By improving clinician understanding of how AI systems function, fail and should be governed, this article aims to support informed, safe and ethical adoption of AI technologies in perioperative environments.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

From Algorithm to Bedside: A Clinician's Framework for AI in Practice

This article proposes seven questions that clinicians can run through to evaluate any clinical AI tool in the time it takes to read an abstract, alongside a traffic-light schema for matching oversight to risk and a short list of demands clinicians should make of vendors and institutions.

Alaa Abdelqader, M. Alkhateeb, Abdullah Al-Marrawi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Explainable AI in Healthcare: A Comparative Analysis of Interpretability Techniques for Clinical Decision Support Systems

It is concluded that explainable artificial intelligence improves trust, reliability, and accountability in healthcare systems and is a prerequisite for successful integration of intelligent technologies into clinical practice.

Riya Jacob K · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Aug 2026

AI Morbidity and Mortality: A Framework for Clinical AI Failure Review

AI Morbidity and Mortality (AI M&M) is intended to complement, rather than replace, model monitoring, patient safety reporting, and regulatory oversight by converting individual AI-in-workflow failures into actionable institutional learning.

Paulius Mui, Dean F. Sittig, Steven Labkoff et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Advancing Trustworthy Clinical Decision Support Through Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Framework for Transparent, Interpretable, and Ethical Healthcare Analytics

A narrative review of the evolving image of XAI as a tool to create trustworthy clinical decision support systems and how it can be performed based on the concepts of transparency, interpretability and moral decision-making concludes that explainability is a fundamental component to the use of AI in everyday clinical p...

Rakesh Venuturumilli, Amoli Singh, Hemanshi Dhaduk et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Mar 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Practice: Validation, Fairness, and Regulatory Challenges: A Systematic Review

AI demonstrates strong potential to improve the effectiveness, safety, and quality of healthcare, however, broader clinical adoption remains constrained by regulatory requirements, interpretability gaps, data quality issues, and workflow integration challenges, underscoring the need for stronger validation practices an...

Ghulam Hussain Noori, Shaista Bibi, Seung Won Lee · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

A Multidisciplinary Model for Risk Management and Detection of Ageist Bias in Healthcare Systems in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

It is argued that traditional clinical risk-management models are structurally insufficient to address opaque algorithmic bias and presented, a conceptual, multidimensional governance framework designed to prevent the codification of human ageism into AI infrastructure is presented.

Eyal Cohen, Yehuda Adler, R. Nissanholtz-Gannot · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.