This paper defines a Workflow Card template informed by a representative set of provenance questions that surface from the execution-level data missing from Model and Data Cards, and evaluates how effectively LLMs use Workflow Cards to understand workflow executions compared with querying provenance databases through a schema-based interface.
Abstract
Model Cards and Data Cards have demonstrated the value of structured, human-readable documentation for machine learning artifacts, capturing their context, parameters, limitations, and intended use. However, these practices remain focused on static artifacts (the datasets and trained models themselves) while overlooking the workflow executions that produce, transform, and evaluate them. Such executions hold critical details about data preparation, parameter choice, runtime behavior, resource use, and intermediate transformations, precisely where bias, performance variation, and reproducibility gaps tend to originate. To close this gap, we introduce Workflow Cards: structured summaries that condense the machine-readable provenance data of a workflow execution into a form both humans and large language models (LLMs) can read and analyze. This paper has two main parts. First, it defines a Workflow Card template informed by a representative set of provenance questions that surface from the execution-level data missing from Model and Data Cards. Second, it evaluates how effectively LLMs use Workflow Cards to understand workflow executions compared with querying provenance databases through a schema-based interface. Results show that Workflow Cards provide execution-level information absent from existing card types, such as Model Cards and Data Cards, thereby filling an important documentation gap; and that Workflow Cards nearly double answer quality compared with schema-based querying, consistently across LLM-as-a-Judge and human assessments.
Summary Large language models (LLMs) increasingly write code, analyze data, and orchestrate scientific workflows. This can create reproducibility challenges because LLMs blur the boundary between how an analysis is built and what it depends on at run time. Guidelines for LLM-assisted science begin with a critical choic...
C. Dunn, Darrin T. Schultz, J. Musser· Patterns· 0 citations
This work introduces SciDocBench, a workflow-centered benchmark targeting capability diagnosis with verifiable training-data construction for scientific-document assistants, and SciDocIR, a structured representation of scientific document objects, layout and cross-reference relations, and provenance.
Shen-Xi Wu, Yu-Hong Liu, Hao-Song Zhang et al.· 1 citation
This manuscript reports the system design, verified capability boundary, deterministic software artifacts, and a reproducible evaluation protocol for BloClaw, an AI4S workstation built around a simple principle: a scientific agent should know what it can do, show how it did it, and state what remains unvalidated.
Yao Qin, Jin-Hua Pang, Xiao-Ming Zhang· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Findings show that the proposed deterministic-first architecture can preserve an auditable structural baseline, quantify observed primary-key and relationship gaps, and prevent model-generated hypotheses from being silently promoted to source-grounded architectural facts.
Oleg Grynets, Olena Pochernina, V. Lyashkevych· 0 citations
BLIP is presented, a bolt-on framework for efficiently inferring a small-sized verifiable provenance for any LLM-powered data processing task, with any LLM, and eight strategies, each guaranteed to find a minimal verifiable provenance are introduced.
Yi-Ming Lin, Sepanta Zeighami, Aditya G. Parameswaran· Proceedings of the VLDB Endo...· 0 citations
Purpose: Research data repositories often lack variable-level metadata. Model-choice screening, checking whether a reported model suits the values of its outcome variable, also requires summaries of those values and links to the analyses that use them. We ask how repositories can represent and acquire them as metadata...
Eryk Kulikowski· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.