Skip to content
Preprint

Workflow Cards: Structured Summaries of Workflow Executions Using Provenance Data

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 51 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper defines a Workflow Card template informed by a representative set of provenance questions that surface from the execution-level data missing from Model and Data Cards, and evaluates how effectively LLMs use Workflow Cards to understand workflow executions compared with querying provenance databases through a schema-based interface.

Abstract

Model Cards and Data Cards have demonstrated the value of structured, human-readable documentation for machine learning artifacts, capturing their context, parameters, limitations, and intended use. However, these practices remain focused on static artifacts (the datasets and trained models themselves) while overlooking the workflow executions that produce, transform, and evaluate them. Such executions hold critical details about data preparation, parameter choice, runtime behavior, resource use, and intermediate transformations, precisely where bias, performance variation, and reproducibility gaps tend to originate. To close this gap, we introduce Workflow Cards: structured summaries that condense the machine-readable provenance data of a workflow execution into a form both humans and large language models (LLMs) can read and analyze. This paper has two main parts. First, it defines a Workflow Card template informed by a representative set of provenance questions that surface from the execution-level data missing from Model and Data Cards. Second, it evaluates how effectively LLMs use Workflow Cards to understand workflow executions compared with querying provenance databases through a schema-based interface. Results show that Workflow Cards provide execution-level information absent from existing card types, such as Model Cards and Data Cards, thereby filling an important documentation gap; and that Workflow Cards nearly double answer quality compared with schema-based querying, consistently across LLM-as-a-Judge and human assessments.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Designing reproducible large-language-model-assisted scientific analyses

Summary Large language models (LLMs) increasingly write code, analyze data, and orchestrate scientific workflows. This can create reproducibility challenges because LLMs blur the boundary between how an analysis is built and what it depends on at run time. Guidelines for LLM-assisted science begin with a critical choic...

C. Dunn, Darrin T. Schultz, J. Musser · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

SciDocBench: A Workflow-Centered Benchmark and Data Pipeline for Scientific Document Understanding

This work introduces SciDocBench, a workflow-centered benchmark targeting capability diagnosis with verifiable training-data construction for scientific-document assistants, and SciDocIR, a structured representation of scientific document objects, layout and cross-reference relations, and provenance.

Shen-Xi Wu, Yu-Hong Liu, Hao-Song Zhang et al. · 1 citation
Review Open access Sep 2026

From Prompt to Provenance: BloClaw, a Capability-Gated AI4S Workstation for Auditable Computational Biology

This manuscript reports the system design, verified capability boundary, deterministic software artifacts, and a reproducible evaluation protocol for BloClaw, an AI4S workstation built around a simple principle: a scientific agent should know what it can do, show how it did it, and state what remains unvalidated.

Yao Qin, Jin-Hua Pang, Xiao-Ming Zhang · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Specification-Driven Data Architecture Reconstruction: From Physical Code to Logical and Conceptual Specifications

Findings show that the proposed deterministic-first architecture can preserve an auditable structural baseline, quantify observed primary-key and relationship gaps, and prevent model-generated hypotheses from being silently promoted to source-grounded architectural facts.

Oleg Grynets, Olena Pochernina, V. Lyashkevych · 0 citations
#small language model Open access Jul 2026

Bolt-on, Verifiable Provenance for LLM-Powered Data Processing

BLIP is presented, a bolt-on framework for efficiently inferring a small-sized verifiable provenance for any LLM-powered data processing task, with any LLM, and eight strategies, each guaranteed to find a minimal verifiable provenance are introduced.

Yi-Ming Lin, Sepanta Zeighami, Aditya G. Parameswaran · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Reading the Data Back: Enriching Variable-Level Metadata for Model-Data Consistency Checks

Purpose: Research data repositories often lack variable-level metadata. Model-choice screening, checking whether a reported model suits the values of its outcome variable, also requires summaries of those values and links to the analyses that use them. We ask how repositories can represent and acquire them as metadata...

Eryk Kulikowski · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.