Skip to content
Review Open access

Structured triage of incidental findings in lung cancer screening: Outcomes from a UK programme.

Aug 2026 · Lung Cancer · Vol 220, pp. 109565 · 0 citations · 30 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Most IFs required no ongoing follow-up, while a minority led to diagnosis and intervention, highlighting a modifiable competing risk that should be integrated into lung cancer screening pathways.

Abstract

Background

Low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening frequently identifies incidental findings (IFs). These have the potential to be beneficial or harmful to the participant and need to be managed effectively. We evaluated whether structured triage of IFs in a real-world screening programme led to meaningful clinical actions or benefit.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed IFs referred according to the national protocol between January 2023 and May 2025. Outcomes included no further action, investigation, referral, surveillance, and/or treatment. Additional detailed analysis evaluated management and early outcomes of moderate or severe coronary artery calcification (CAC).

Results

Of 15,465 LDCT scans, 1,049 IFs in 1,030 participants were referred and reviewed by the service (6.8% of total LDCTs). Thirty-seven percent required no action after review; 23% required a single investigation. 292 (27.8%) led to new diagnoses; 51 participants (4.9%) received medical treatment, and 15 (1.4%) underwent surgery. Sixty-three incidental cancers were detected, of which 63.5% received radical treatment. Common IFs included aortic valve calcification (21.0%), thoracic aortic dilatation (10.0%), and renal abnormalities (9.9%). Among 904 participants with moderate or severe CAC, 220 were not on lipid-lowering therapy at baseline. Of these, only 35% initiated treatment within two years. All-cause mortality in this group was 4.7% at two years, with one-third due to cardiovascular causes.

Conclusion

Structured triage enables consistent, proportionate IF management. Most IFs required no ongoing follow-up, while a minority led to diagnosis and intervention. CAC was common and undertreated, highlighting a modifiable competing risk that should be integrated into lung cancer screening pathways.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Increasing uptake of lung cancer screening through a patient 'nudge': A randomized pragmatic trial.

INTRODUCTION Population-level benefits of lung cancer screening (LCS) depend upon high participation, yet uptake remains low because of patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers. This study evaluated whether a pre-visit patient "nudge" increases LCS uptake. STUDY DESIGN Patients were randomized by birth-month in...

N. Carroll, A. MacLennan, K. Wain et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Pilot feasibility study to deliver low-dose CT lung cancer screening in Scotland: descriptive findings from the LungScot study

Abstract Objectives To assess the feasibility and acceptability of delivering risk-stratified low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening across diverse geographical and socioeconomic settings in Scotland and to characterise uptake, participant profile and screening outcomes. Design Prospective, multicentre pilot feasibil...

Debbie Cavers, A. Akram, E. Sage et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Lung cancer screening in occupational settings: a scoping review

Occupational settings present significant opportunities for early lung cancer detection among high-risk workers, while offering potential benefits for those with low or uncharacterized exposures, but the evidence base remains limited.

E. Okoro, H. Keller, F. Greiner et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Lung Cancer Screening in High-Risk Populations: Current Evidence, Implementation Challenges, and Future Directions

A structured narrative review of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 2002 and March 2026 supplemented by review of current clinical guidelines from the USPSTF, NCCN, ACS, CHEST, and ERS established the mortality benefit of low-dose computed tomography screening.

Arihant Surana, Riya Bhattacharya · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Perceptions of Incidental Findings on Lung Cancer Screening Exams: A National Survey of Primary Care Clinicians and Radiologists.

RATIONALE Unlike other common cancer screenings, annual lung cancer screening often identifies a spectrum of incidental findings unrelated to lung cancer. While these findings could be actionable, how to best communicate and manage them can be a challenge, often falling upon primary care clinicians. OBJECTIVES Evalua...

R. Bollam, A. O'Laughlin, T. Caverly et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Long-term efficacy and adherence of a lung cancer screening strategy with extended LDCT intervals: Results from the BioMILD trial.

Lung cancer (LC) screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces mortality through early-stage detection, yet evidence on long-term effectiveness and adherence remains limited. This study reports nearly 10-year outcomes from the prospective BioMILD trial, which enrolled 4,119 heavy smokers undergoing risk-ad...

R. Ledda, F. Sabia, K. S. Beck et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.