A comprehensive overview of data-driven methods for both deterministic and stochastic dynamical systems, highlighting the inherent differences and challenges that arise compared to the deterministic case.
Abstract
Data-driven approaches with formal guarantees have recently emerged as a powerful means for the verification and controller synthesis of complex dynamical systems. Interest in these methods is rapidly growing, as system models are often unavailable in practice, and challenges such as nonlinear behavior, uncertainty, and the curse of dimensionality typically render accurate modeling infeasible. These difficulties motivate leveraging limited data collected from the system while still providing formal guarantees on its overall behavior. The community has therefore proposed a few hundred articles on the development of data-driven frameworks that enable the formal verification and synthesis of dynamical systems without explicit models, addressing complex specifications beyond stability. Despite this rapid growth, existing results remain scattered and lack a coherent organization, limiting a clear understanding of their principles, distinctions, and practical potential. This survey fills this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of these data-driven methods for both deterministic and stochastic dynamical systems. We structure the literature around three main methodological pillars in formal methods: (in)finite-abstraction-based techniques, functional certificate approaches, such as control barrier certificates, and compositional methods. For each of these approaches, we classify the resulting data-driven guarantees into three main categories: (i) statistical guarantees grounded in probably approximately correct and scenario-based frameworks, (ii) guarantees derived from Lipschitz continuity, and (iii) guarantees exploiting structural properties. While the literature on deterministic systems is considerably richer, we also devote particular attention to the stochastic counterpart, highlighting the inherent differences and challenges that arise compared to the deterministic case.
Identifying stochastic dynamical systems from observational data remains a major challenge in applied mathematics and engineering, particularly when complex systems are influenced by random perturbations and incomplete empirical information. This comprehensive review aims to examine state-of-the-art data-driven methods...
Rishav Jha, Kameshwar Sahani, S. K. Sahani et al.· African Multidisciplinary Jo...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence, integrated within physics-informed computational frameworks, provides a powerful tool for analyzing complex, high-dimensional, and heterogeneous datasets while preserving the dynamical structure of the underlying system.
Giovanna Zimatore, Piercesare Grimaldi, S. Hatzopoulos et al.· Frontiers of Physics· 1 citation
The data-driven discovery of governing equations for dynamical systems has emerged as a transformative paradigm, enabling the extraction of interpretable and generalizable models from observational data. While modern techniques have advanced this field, traditional subset regression remains a foundational yet underutil...
Weizhen Li, Qiang Fu, Yifan Hong et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
A physics-informed Koopman representation based on generalized momenta is introduced, yielding a linear control-affine model in lifted coordinates with known input structure that avoids the bilinear state – input coupling inherent in standard Koopman approaches, enabling improved prediction accuracy and tractable contr...
This work presents a modular framework for discovering piecewise-smooth dynamical systems by first estimating switching hyperplanes from data and then learning smooth dynamics within each region using geometry-constrained neural networks.
D. Murari, Erik Jansson, Chris Budd Obe et al.· 0 citations