Skip to content

Zero-Knowledge Proof of Progress: Secure Multi-Phase Capture-the-Flag Competitions

Jul 2026 · IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium · pp. 253-268 · 0 citations · 45 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Existing Capture-the-Flag (CTF) platforms trust a single organizer, offer limited auditability, and are vulnerable to infrastructure-level manipulation. We propose zk–MPSFV, a zk-SNARK-based, multi-phase sub-flag verification scheme that replaces centralized scoring with an on-chain, zero-knowledge, publicly verifiable scoreboard. Challenges are decomposed into sub-challenges arranged as a directed acyclic graph (DAG): a team unlocks the next step only after proving completion of all parent nodes. Sub-flags and decryption keys are jointly generated by n organizers and released via an off-chain ($t, n$) Shamir–BLS threshold signature produced through multi-party computation (MPC), preventing any single organizer from leaking or altering keys. Teams submit zk-PLONK proofs that the contract verifies, timestamps, and records immutably. Under standard assumptions (collision-resistant hashing, SNARK soundness/zero-knowledge, IND-CCA2 ECIES, and at least t honest organizers), we prove that zk–MPSFV achieves the stated security goals, including DAG-gated progress, anti-replay, and threshold-robust organizer security, while out-of-band flag sharing remains out of scope. On a three-organizer testbed with 30 simulated teams, setup costs 0.45 ms per sub-flag, proof generation averages 5.34 s on an 8-core system, and on-chain verification costs $\approx$ 170kL2 gas on zkSync Era with a median fee of 1.33 $\times 10^{-6}$ ETH (about ${\$}$0.0046 at ${\$}$3,435/ETH). Stress replays sustain $\approx$ 7 proof transactions/s up to 5000 proofs; extrapolating to 50,000 proofs (1000 teams $\times$ 50 submissions) yields $\approx$ 0.0665 ETH (about ${\$}$200–${\$}$228) and $\approx$ 2 hours of settlement time. Overall, zk-MPSFV is practical for small- to mid-scale, audit-ready progression CTFs.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Threshold Authorization Without Threshold Signatures: Signature-Agnostic MPC Custody

A dual-gate architecture that separates member authentication from threshold authorization is presented, which can be deployed wherever the asset-control path supports programmable verification, and produces an enforcement-layer authorization rather than a native chain signature.

Dariia Porechna · 1 citation
Open access Jul 2026

Optimizing and Implementing Threshold MAYO

This work presents a practical t-out-of-n threshold variant and emulation of MAYO, a post-quantum signature candidate to NIST’s call for additional signatures, and proposes a unified protocol framework that integrate these techniques, plus other MPC specific optimizations, with the goal of minimizing online latency.

Diego F. Aranha, Giacomo Borin, Sofía Celi et al. · 1 citation
Conference Jul 2026

AcadVault: A Privacy-First Blockchain Credential Framework Achieving O(1) Batch Issuance via Merkle Tree and SSS-based Distributed Key Recovery

A national audit that revealed 10,000 fake credentials among 400,035 public employees demonstrates the severity of the global threat posed by academic credential fraud. Although blockchain-based credential systems provide a promising countermeasure, existing architectures suffer from four persistent shortcomings: (1) c...

Balasubramanian Prashanth, M. Ramchander · 0 citations
2026

Verifiable and Fair Registered Attribute-Based Multi-Hop Proxy Re-Encryption Scheme for LLM Agents

As Large Language Model (LLM) agents emerge as intelligent coordinators, they intensify the demand for secure sharing and forwarding of sensitive data in data-driven systems. Existing Attribute-Based Proxy Re-Encryption (ABPRE) offers fine-grained access control and secure data forwarding, but suffers from the key escr...

Dong-Liang Cai, Yiwen Gao, Qixiang Li et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

KORD: Breaking the Key-Generation Bottleneck in Dealerless FSS via Protocol--Hardware Co-Design

KORD is presented, a protocol--hardware co-design that dramatically reduces the cost of dealerless FSS key generation and forms a security boundary within which KORD restructures the generation protocol, collapsing the interaction of prior dealerless protocols into a single round, independent of GGM depth.

Yi-Jing Peng, Lin Liu, Yu-Jie Xue et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.