Jul 2026· GECCO Companion· pp. 441-444· 0 citations· 18 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This work develops a transition from classification to regression for symbolic regression by first discretizing the task into a fixed number of classes, progressively increasing their number, and finally by using full regression fairness metrics, demonstrating the framework on the Law School Admission Council dataset.
Abstract
For a fair society, decisions impacting people's lives must be taken fairly, irrespective of their protected characteristics. To achieve algorithmic fairness, appropriate measures must guide machine learning methods toward fair(er) decision recommendations. There are numerous fairness metrics for classification; however, for regression the literature is still developing. Most fair machine learning methods combine fairness and error in a single objective. Instead, we apply multi-objective optimization, allowing the fairness metrics to be optimized alongside the error. We develop a transition from classification to regression for symbolic regression by first discretizing the task into a fixed number of classes, progressively increasing their number, and finally by using full regression fairness metrics. We demonstrate the framework on the Law School Admission Council dataset. While fairness objectives do not appear to be significantly different among methods, accuracy is clearly better when applying full regression fairness.
An example of its application in the legal field that explores the existing biases in models today is presented and it is hypothesized that the fairness criteria being evaluated cannot all three be satisfied simultaneously, leading to a machine learning model that remains unfair.
Keshav Pillutla, Kevin Fry· Journal of emerging investig...· 0 citations
This work introduces a method to lower-bound the discrepancy of a classifier: a quantity that jointly captures inaccuracy and unfairness, and develops a computationally efficient procedure for calculating the tightest possible lower bound on the classifier’s discrepancy.
This article proposes that algorithmic fairness is best understood as a human-technology interaction problem rather than a purely technical challenge, and offers an interdisciplinary perspective that integrates insights from social justice, psychology, computer science, judgment and decision-making, and management.
A. Lemmens· Current Opinion in Psycholog...· 0 citations
A robust, reliable, and reproducible methodology for evaluating group fairness in classification algorithms, and provides a methodological approach for assessing fairness within the Sufficiency criterion by operationalizing Calibration.
Massimiliano Mancini, D. Merlini, M. Verri· International Conference on...· 0 citations
This work introduces Fairabel, a novel approach that repairs fairness by mutating the training data under the guidance of causal models and multi-objective optimization, and shows that Fairabel reduces ML software bias by 50% on average across three fairness metrics, outperforming the state-of-the-art with a 9% relativ...
Ying Xiao, Zhen-Peng Chen, Yepang Liu et al.· ACM Transactions on Software...· 0 citations
FedFairLAB is introduced, a FL method that enforces group, intersectional, and multiclass fairness simultaneously at both the local and global levels and a tunable performance budget allows practitioners to control how much predictive performance can be sacrificed to improve fairness.
Michele Fontana, Francesca Naretto, A. Monreale· Data mining and knowledge di...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.