Skip to content
Review Open access

Hydrogel-based strategies for periprosthetic joint infection: from osteoimmune mechanisms to clinical translation

Aug 2026 · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · Vol 14 · 0 citations · 105 references
Medicine

TL;DR

A hydrogel-enabled perspective supports indication-driven design and more rigorous evaluation of local biomaterial strategies for PJI and indicates that hydrogels are not universally superior when mechanical support, established surgical familiarity, or long-term structural stability is required.

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is sustained by implant-associated biofilms, ineffective immune activation, oxidative stress, and impaired osseointegration, and therefore requires more than local bacterial killing alone. Hydrogel-based therapies have attracted growing attention, but their biological effects are often attributed indiscriminately to the hydrogel even when they are primarily produced by incorporated antibiotics, antimicrobial peptides, enzymes, nanoparticles, growth factors, or cells. This narrative review develops a material-centered framework that distinguishes three sources of therapeutic activity: matrix-intrinsic functions, payload-derived biological effects, and hydrogel-enabled effects. We summarize the interface-specific pathophysiology of PJI and analyze the hydrogel properties most relevant to peri-implant treatment, including local retention, injectability, conformability to irregular dead space, wet-surface and implant-interface adaptation, tunable degradation, controlled or stimuli-responsive release, and extracellular matrix-like support. Representative antibacterial, antibiofilm, redox-regulating, immunomodulatory, angiogenic, and osteogenic systems are assessed according to their material composition, payload, release mechanism, experimental model, and direct relevance to true PJI. Hydrogels are also compared with polymethylmethacrylate cement, calcium sulfate carriers, nanoparticles or microspheres, electrospun scaffolds, and conventional implant coatings to clarify their scenario-specific advantages and limitations. The available evidence indicates that hydrogels are most valuable when they improve spatial retention, temporal sequencing, interface contact, or compatibility with labile therapeutics; they are not universally superior when mechanical support, established surgical familiarity, or long-term structural stability is required. Translation will depend on clinically representative implant-associated models, standardized reporting, sterilization and storage compatibility, reproducible manufacturing, surgical usability, and proportionate regulatory complexity. This hydrogel-enabled perspective supports indication-driven design and more rigorous evaluation of local biomaterial strategies for PJI.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Hydrogels for Local Drug Delivery in Biofilm-Associated Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Current Progress and Future Directions

Recent advances in hydrogel-based approaches are summarized, including antibiotic-loaded hydrogels, systems incorporating anti-biofilm enzymes, bacteriophage-loaded formulations, and nanoparticle-enhanced platforms, aiming to enhance biofilm eradication and improve treatment outcomes in patients with PJI.

Karolina Kraus, Paweł Mikziński, Bindu Subhadra et al. · 1 citation
Review Open access Sep 2026

From Infection Control to Tissue Regeneration: Mechanisms, Design Strategies, and Smart Advances in Antibacterial Hydrogels

This review systematically summarizes the major antibacterial mechanisms of hydrogels, including cationic contact-killing, chemical antibacterial activity mediated by metal ions and reactive halogen species, nanozyme-catalyzed reactions and bidirectional regulation of reactive oxygen species, as well as photothermal sy...

Peng Liu, Lin Chen, Jin-Jun Tian et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Piezoelectric Nanocoatings on Bio-Interfaces: Microenvironment Remodeling, Biofilm Disruption, and Immunomodulatory Integration

This review evaluates the material design principles and classifications of inorganic, organic, and hybrid piezoelectric nanocoatings and detail their multifaceted antibacterial mechanisms and trace their therapeutic potential in orthopedic and dental implants, as well as wound management.

Yue-Meng Li, Li-Xin Tang, Peng-Fei Gao et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Nanocellulose as an Active Biointerface: Design Principles for Infection-Adaptive and Regenerative Biomaterials.

This review delineates the evolution from fundamental material design principles, such as NC morphology control and surface chemistry modulation, to the development of NC-based platforms capable of disrupting mature biofilms and eliminating pathogenic bacteria.

Tejal V. Patil, Rumi Acharya, Ki-Taek Lim · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Hydrogel-Based Therapies for Periodontal Wound Healing

Overall, hydrogels represent a promising adjunct in regenerative periodontal therapy, although further research is required to support their translation into routine clinical practice.

Francisco Jean Pierre Romero Febres, Mateus Teles Artioli Godoi, Fernando Afonso de Oliveira et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Hydrogel microspheres for osteoarthritis treatment: Fabrication strategies, smart responsiveness, and multimodal therapies

This review summarizes various therapeutic strategies supported by hydrogel microspheres, including the precise controlled release of small-molecule drugs, the regulation of endogenous stem cell recruitment and directed differentiation, the targeted delivery of gene therapy drugs, and synergistic treatment modalities.

Zhuo-Xuan Song, Xin-Yu Song, Rui Zhao et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.