This work studies how continuous latent thoughts can be trained to anticipate informative aspects of future solutions without verbalizing every intermediate step and introduces Latent JEPA, a framework that combines autoregressive learning with joint-embedding prediction of one or more future views.
Abstract
Large language models offer a promising foundation for chemical reasoning, bringing together chemical knowledge and multistep problem solving. Chemical intuition can provide an initial sense of plausible outcomes before the details of a solution are fully worked out. Inspired by how such expectations complement explicit analysis, we study how continuous latent thoughts can be trained to anticipate informative aspects of future solutions without verbalizing every intermediate step. We introduce Latent JEPA, a framework that combines autoregressive learning with joint-embedding prediction of one or more future views. For chemical reasoning, we develop textual and molecular prediction objectives that connect latent thoughts to both subsequent reasoning and molecular outcomes. Experiments on ChemCoTBench show gains in molecular optimization and on several editing and reaction metrics. Representation analyses show that future prediction makes latent thoughts more informative about molecular outcomes and strengthens their correspondence with chemical structure. These findings support abstract future prediction as a learning principle for connecting continuous latent reasoning with scientific outcomes.
Latent reasoning performs intermediate computation in continuous space rather than through explicit tokens, which is particularly appealing in chemistry, where errors in explicit reasoning can propagate to the final answer. Yet if latent states truly constitute an implicit reasoning chain, they should be causally impor...
Current chemistry benchmarks primarily evaluate outcome prediction or reaction pathway generation, but rarely test whether a model can explain why an observed chemical effect occurs. We introduce ChemExplain, a benchmark of 1,180 multiple-choice chemistry questions drawn from 383 peer-reviewed papers. Each question pai...
Ao-Tian Chen, Frazier N. Baker, Reza Averly et al.· 0 citations
Scientific discovery seeks mechanisms that explain observations and predict beyond the measurements that produced them. Whereas large language models (LLMs) encode knowledge implicitly, mechanistic world models organise it as a parsimonious set of explicit, modular, reusable mechanisms whose predictions can be scored a...
Theodore de Pomereu, B. Snelling, Fabian Fröhlich· bioRxiv· 1 citation
Autoregressive Thought Flow is introduced, which models the next continuous thought as a multimodal distribution, and suggests that continuous reasoning is more effective when multiple possible next thoughts remain available rather than being collapsed into a single prediction.
Yang Li, Yi Wang, Shinda Huang et al.· 0 citations
Latent Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning improves efficiency by shifting intermediate computation into continuous hidden states. However, fully latent methods often struggle on precision-critical tasks such as mathematical reasoning, while existing hybrid approaches retain substantial token-generation overhead. We intro...
Zhe-Hao Zhou, Tong Su, Sheng-Yu Zhu et al.· 1 citation
Recent advances in test-time optimization have shown that the multimodal reasoning performance of large multimodal language models (MLLMs) can be improved during inference without modifying backbone model parameters. However, existing approaches primarily operate at the prompt or output level, leaving the latent reason...
Fan-Ci Meng, Kun Wang, Gui-Bin Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 27, 2026
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.