Graph-Structured Rubrics (GSR) is introduced, which compiles a rubric into a response-independent typed evaluation graph before observing responses and achieves the numerically highest end-to-end pairwise accuracy on two preference benchmarks under native tie and abstention policies.
Abstract
Rubric-based evaluators commonly treat rubrics as prompt context or flat criteria: they specify what to judge but leave criterion composition implicit, even when natural-language rules state it. We introduce Graph-Structured Rubrics (GSR), which compiles a rubric into a response-independent typed evaluation graph before observing responses. Criterion nodes elicit judgments; transformation, reduction, and gating operators compose them through named ports; and a task-specific output mapping, termed Readout, converts the unique sink into a score or preference. Compilation rejects malformed or type-incompatible graphs. Pointwise evaluation judges rubric dimensions separately before graph aggregation; pairwise evaluation reuses the graph with one judgment for each candidate under every criterion. Under GPT-OSS-120B, GSR improves exact score agreement by 0.62--6.75 percentage points over Prometheus-style scoring on four pointwise datasets and achieves the numerically highest end-to-end pairwise accuracy on two preference benchmarks under native tie and abstention policies.
The results suggest a novel way of approaching automated evaluation, by offering a faster, more explainable, and less ambiguous alternative to black-box rubric evals, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and banking where precision and auditability are critical.
Kaustubh D. Dhole, Charles L. A. Clarke, E. Agichtein· 0 citations
Small language models can grade open-ended examination answers as reliably as substantially more expensive models when they grade against an explicit rubric. We test this claim as the design principle behind any-to-bench: a frontier model reads source documents once, at ingestion, to extract each question and its rubri...
A structured meta-rubric framework that captures the grading criteria at authoring time, and fixed mechanical rules compile it into a flat checklist of binary, machine-gradable checks that an LLM judge scores reliably at evaluation time is instantiated.
Xilun Chen, Zhaleh Feizollahi, Ross Goodwin et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Rubrics provide structured, fine-grained signals for training and evaluating large language models (LLMs). Yet reliable query-specific rubrics are difficult to construct. Existing approaches often derive supervision from human-written rubrics, preference data, or sampled responses. Direct query-to-rubric generation avo...
Hao Yang, Licheng Pan, Xiaoxi Li et al.· 0 citations
ClosureBench is introduced, a constructive benchmark for compositional graph-relational reasoning with programmatically verified ground truth with programmatically verified ground truth: each task's reference answer is computed by executing a program in the Ein tensor-logic language, ensuring machine-verified correctne...
DecoEvo (Decoupled Co-Evolution), which co-evolves a solver skill and a rubric-generator skill under decoupled objectives without using gold rubrics during optimization, is introduced.
Jiangwang Chen, Zixin Song, Junlin Liu et al.· arXiv.org· 3 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.