Aug 2026· 1 citation· ⚡ 1 influential· 99 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
Capek 0.5 is presented, an embodied vision-language model built around an execution-centric capability taxonomy that improves the large majority of matched benchmark rows over its initialization, retains all four specialized capabilities in one checkpoint with quantified losses, and transfers to closed-loop embodied task execution.
Abstract
Vision-language models are increasingly serving as the reasoning core of embodied agents. Robot execution is inherently iterative: each action reshapes the scene and physical state, continually renewing what must be perceived, reasoned about, and verified. Meeting these demands requires complementary capabilities that differ in supervision signals, prediction formats, and verification criteria. Existing approaches typically develop these capabilities against isolated, task-specific objectives, leaving open how they should be organized and integrated around execution as a whole. We present Capek 0.5, an embodied vision-language model built around an execution-centric capability taxonomy. Rather than organizing training by datasets or tasks, the taxonomy groups embodied capabilities according to their functional roles throughout execution and comprises four capability families: Spatial Reasoning, Temporal Understanding, Action Guidance, and State Verification. Each capability is first acquired by a dedicated specialist through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards from a shared backbone, and the specialists are then consolidated into a single inference-time model through weight-space merging followed by routed policy-space distillation. We instantiate Capek 0.5 at the 2B and 35B-A3B scales and evaluate it from three complementary perspectives: comprehensive benchmark suites including Capek-StateBench, a new benchmark for state verification; a controlled study of capability retention from specialists to the unified model; and closed-loop evaluation in simulated embodied environments. Capek 0.5 improves the large majority of matched benchmark rows over its initialization, retains all four specialized capabilities in one checkpoint with quantified losses, and transfers to closed-loop embodied task execution.
This work presents PhyAgentOS, a runtime foundation delivering scheduling, verification, memory, benchmarking, and safety as system-level services, and distinguishes execution termination from semantic task completion via evidence-grounded verdicts of success, failure, or replan.
Yang Liu, Weixing Chen, Xinshuai Song et al.· arXiv.org· 2 citations
A comprehensive review of VLA models for Embodied AI from an action‐generation perspective and proposes an action‐generation‐centered taxonomy that categorizes VLA models into three paradigms: direct policy learning, generative action modeling, and reasoning‐guided modeling.
Ning Xiong, Mingle Xu, Wei Chen et al.· Journal of Field Robotics· 0 citations
ACE-Brain-0.5 is presented, a unified embodied foundation model that organizes robot intelligence into five coupled functions: spatial perception, decision making, embodied interaction, self-monitoring, and self-improvement, and SSR+, which extends Scaffold-Specialize-Reconcile with a Reactivate stage after task-vector...
Zi-Yang Gong, Hao-Ming Gu, Ze-Hang Luo et al.· arXiv.org· 3 citations
The model achieves the best performance among similarly sized models on 19 of the 38 benchmarks and substantially outperforms strong competitors, including Qwen3.6-A3B and Cosmos 3.5 MoT-2B, and demonstrates strong performance on embodied agentic tasks requiring multi-turn interaction and long-horizon reasoning.
Vision-language-action (VLA) and world-action models typically absorb unfamiliar manipulation tasks through additional robot data collection and policy optimization. This recurring retraining burden slows the acquisition of new behavior. We present Teach-and-Grow Learning (TGL), a training-free architecture that turns...
Chang Nie, Zhe Liu, He-Sheng Wang· The international journal of...· 2 citations
This survey revisits VLN from a component-internal perspective, viewing it as a navigation system composed of internal components such as instructions, environment representations, and embodied agents, and organizing existing work around the functions and interactions of these components.