Skip to content

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES FOLLOWING SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN CONTROLLED HYPERTENSIVE AND NORMOTENSIVE PATIENTS

2026 · Asian Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences · 0 citations

TL;DR

Controlled hypertensive patients experience greater hemodynamic instability following spinal anaesthesia compared to normotensive individuals, with higher incidence and earlier onset of hypotension and increased vasopressor requirement.

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal anaesthesia commonly causes hypotension due to sympathetic blockade. Controlled hypertensive patients may exhibit altered cardiovascular responses because of vascular and autonomic changes. Evidence comparing hypertensive and normotensive patients remains inconsistent. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate hemodynamic changes following spinal anaesthesia to improve perioperative risk stratification and management.Material and Method: This comparative observational study included 120 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I–III patients (40–75 years) undergoing elective infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were grouped as controlled hypertensive or normotensive. Standardized spinal technique and monitoring were used. Hemodynamic variables were recorded up to 30 minutes. Hypotension was predefined and managed accordingly. Statistical analysis included t-test, ANOVA, Chi-square, and Pearson correlation.Result:A total of 120 patients undergoing spinal anaesthesiawere studied i.e. 60 Controlled hypertensive patients (CHT) and 60 normotensive (NT) with comparable demographics and surgical characteristics. Controlled hypertensive patients had higher baseline mean arterial pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and experienced greater maximum hemodynamic declines. Hypotension (48.3% vs 28.3%) and vasopressor requirement were significantly higher in CHT patients. Advanced age, elevated baseline pressures, higher sensory block, increased body mass index (BMI), and longer surgery predicted hypotension.Conclusion: Controlled hypertensive patients experience greater hemodynamic instability following spinal anaesthesia compared to normotensive individuals, with higher incidence and earlier onset of hypotension and increased vasopressor requirement. Careful monitoring and individualized perioperative management are essential to improve safety and outcomes.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

Hemodynamic Changes with Propofol and Etomidate During Induction of Anaesthesia in Controlled Hypertensive Patients

Objective: To determine the mean hemodynamic changes with etomidate and propofol during anaesthetic induction in controlled hypertensive patients. Study Design: Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Anaesthesia Department, Combined Military Hospital Malir, Karachi, Pakistan from Mar 2019 to Mar 2020. M...

Muhammad Wasib, U. Khalid, F. Wahid et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Before the Pressure Falls: Preoperative Autonomic Reserve as a Physiological Predictor of Hemodynamic Instability After General Anesthesia Induction

Background: Post-induction hypotension is a frequent complication of general anesthesia and may reflect inadequate cardiovascular compensation to anesthetic-induced vasodilation. Preoperative assessment of autonomic reserve may identify patients at increased risk. Methods: This prospective observational study included...

Neeraj Kumar, Praveen Dm · 0 citations
Aug 2026

EXPRESS: Preoperative Corrected Carotid Flow Time Is Associated With Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Hypertensive Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) is common in hypertensive patients, yet reliable preoperative markers remain limited. Corrected carotid flow time (CCFT) is a Doppler-derived index influenced by preload and ventricular ejection timing, but its association with SAIH in this population has not been...

M. Tutar, Hasan Mermer, Ali Aydın Öner et al. · 0 citations
2026

ASSESSMENT OF HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES AND RECOVERY PROFILE USING PROPOFOL VERSUS ETOMIDATE FOR INDUCTION OF GENERAL ANESTHESIA

Background: Intravenous induction agents play a vital role in maintaining hemodynamic stability during general anesthesia. Propofol is commonly preferred because of its rapid onset and smooth recovery profile, although it frequently causes hypotension and cardiovascular depression. Etomidate is considered more hemodyna...

Payal Uikey, Pravin Kanoje, Syed Zeb Raza · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Combination antihypertensive therapy and anesthesia-induced hypotension: A prospective comparative observational study

Perioperative hemodynamic instability is a major concern in hypertensive patients undergoing general anesthesia. Nearly 45% of these patients require dual antihypertensive therapy, yet the perioperative effects of specific drug combinations remain poorly defined. While single-agent effects are well documented, da...

Pradeep K. Bhatia, Priyanka Sethi, B. Paliwal et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Associated Factors of Pre-Anesthesia Blood Pressure Elevation in Elective Non-Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Case-Control Study Comparing Two Diagnostic Thresholds

Background Pre-anesthesia blood pressure (BP) elevation frequently occurs in normotensive elective surgical patients and may disrupt perioperative safety. This study adopted two mainstream diagnostic criteria (absolute and relative thresholds) to define BP elevation, and integrated physical, laboratory and psychologica...

Xiao-Min Li, Yan Yang, Hao Pan et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.