Aug 2026· Frontiers in Emerging Multidisciplinary Sciences· 0 citations
TL;DR
The analysis indicates that combining predictive defect-risk scores with automated test selection can potentially reduce redundant testing, concentrate computational resources on high-risk software components, and improve feedback speed, but model reliability depends on historical defect data, feature quality, distributional stability, explainability, and integration with existing development pipelines.
Abstract
The increasing complexity, scale, and release frequency of contemporary software systems have exposed limitations in conventional testing practices, particularly in exhaustive test execution, regression validation, and early defect identification. This research proposes an intelligent framework that integrates artificial intelligence (AI)-based test automation with software defect prediction to establish a proactive quality-engineering process. The proposed framework combines requirement and code analysis, automated test generation, execution prioritization, defect-risk estimation, feedback-driven model refinement, and quality reporting within a unified architecture. The methodological foundation is a conceptual synthesis of AI-driven test automation principles, with particular emphasis on automation, intelligent prioritization, and predictive quality assurance as discussed by Ramamurthy (2023). The supplied reference corpus also demonstrates how intelligent sensing, pattern recognition, resource optimization, and data-driven classification can conceptually inform automated quality-monitoring architectures, although most of these studies originate outside software testing. The proposed model therefore treats cross-domain evidence as methodological inspiration rather than direct empirical validation. The analysis indicates that combining predictive defect-risk scores with automated test selection can potentially reduce redundant testing, concentrate computational resources on high-risk software components, and improve feedback speed. However, model reliability depends on historical defect data, feature quality, distributional stability, explainability, and integration with existing development pipelines. The framework contributes a structured basis for AI-assisted software quality engineering while identifying empirical validation, benchmark datasets, and explainable prediction as priorities for future research.
A conceptual evaluation indicates that AI-assisted regression testing can improve the alignment between code changes and test execution priorities, reduce redundant execution, and create feedback loops capable of adapting to changing Agile projects.
Tomas Kazlauskas· The American Journal of Engi...· 0 citations
It is concluded that AI-based test automation can substantially strengthen software quality engineering when intelligence is integrated as an adaptive reasoning layer rather than treated merely as an alternative mechanism for script generation.
Priyanka Sharma· American Journal Of Applied...· 0 citations
An application-focused review of 35 selected empirical studies focusing on the use of AI during software testing, based on PRISMA guidelines, reveals that large language models, machine learning, and computer vision can significantly improve testing efficiency.
Guilherme Martins, Nelson N. Tenório, Jorge Bernardino· Big Data and Cognitive Compu...· 2 citations
This research examines an AI-enabled approach to test-case generation and optimization for modern software development by synthesizing evidence from studies concerning augmented reality, simulation-based learning, computational visualization, embedded-system monitoring, and AI-driven software quality engineering.
Dinesh Perera, Nethmi Fernando· International Journal of Nex...· 0 citations
Findings indicate that AI-driven testing significantly improves test coverage and execution efficiency, while predictive defect analytics reduces maintenance costs and accelerates fault detection and reliability optimization algorithms enhance system availability and service resilience.
Vishwa Ramalingam· International Journal of Art...· 0 citations
The analysis indicates that no single model is universally optimal; robust software failure prediction requires dataset-aware preprocessing, leakage-safe validation, imbalance-aware evaluation, and an explicit trade-off among predictive performance, computational efficiency, and interpretability.
Prasad Mathapati, S. G. Gollagi, Zebashireen Fahim Shaikh· International journal of res...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.