Skip to content
Conference Open access

The end of Coding: Predicting a Post-Code World with AI-Native Software Development

2025 · Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Interdisciplinary Research in Science, Engineering, and Technology · 0 citations · 21 references

TL;DR

The research found out three things about how developers use Artificial Intelligence, adoption of Artificial Intelligence satisfaction, and with Artificial Intelligence the different ways developers are using Artificial Intelligence is changing.

Abstract

: We are in a time of change in regards to the emergence of software development as we know it due to the growing number of developers using large language models (LLMs), which eventually will enable major shifts toward the "post-code" era in which software development will become less reliant on coding through using AI-driven development systems that accept natural language and high-level specifications as inputs. This research will analyze the impact of these AI assistants (e.g., GitHub Copilot, Gemini and GPT) through quantitative data collected from Stack Overflow Developer Surveys, GitHub Octoverse Reports, and JetBrains Developer Ecosystem Survey regarding how developers are currently embedding AI into their current practices and what it will look like moving forward. The research found out three things about how developers use Artificial Intelligence. These things are adoption of Artificial Intelligence satisfaction, with Artificial Intelligence the different ways developers are using Artificial Intelligence is changing. The results indicate that there is a distinct directional trend toward AI-native development environments, and that developers are in the midst of rapid change to adopt these tools.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

The Role of AI in Application Development: A Comparative Study with Manual Coding

It is concluded that AI meaningfully augments developer productivity but does not yet demonstrably improve satisfaction or earnings, and that a hybrid human-AI model, supported by governance and training, remains the most defensible direction for application development.

Perseus Bhavnagri · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Understanding and Reducing Code Smells in AI-Generated Java Code Using Explainable AI and Prompt Optimization

Recently, Developers have been relying on AI tools to support them in their daily work by generating code. While the use of large language model-based AI tools has improved productivity, the quality of the generated code wasn't always optimal. In a lot of cases, the code includes design issues known as code smells, whi...

Y. Younes, Yousef Elsheikh · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Unreliable in Practice? A Comprehensive Study of Errors in LLM-Generated Code

It is observed that generated code often omits basic input validation or memory-safety checks, which can lead to overflows, resource exhaustion, or other reliability/security issues, and even the largest models frequently make simple mistakes.

Rodrigo Pato Nogueira, Marco Vieira, João R. Campos · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

The Specification Paradox: Rethinking Requirements Engineering in the Age of AI

The growing adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Software Engineering has reinforced the expectation that coding activities can be largely automated. However, this perception may represent yet another historical search for a solution capable of eliminating the inherent challenges of software development. This ar...

T. Sirqueira, Jessica Faciroli · 1 citation
Open access 2026

Enhancing Code Quality through AI-Powered Metric-Driven Refactoring: A Multi-Model Analysis

Investigating LLMs as metric-driven refactoring assistants rather than code generators suggests that while LLMs are valuable assistants for structural improvement, their interventions require careful monitoring to avoid unintended trade-offs.

Tindwende Thierry Sawadogo, Fadel Touré · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Comparing the Quality of Code Generated by Vibe Coding Tools

This study compares the structural quality of code produced by three widely adopted vibe coding tools --- Lovable, v0, and Replit --- starting from a single generation prompt and suggests that choosing between vibe coding tools involves structural trade-offs that go beyond perceived productivity.

Gustavo Rubin da Mota, Kiev Gama · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.