Aug 2026· Journal of Leadership for Basic and Higher Education· Vol 1, pp. 16-21· 0 citations
Abstract
Background: Universities increasingly appoint early-career academics to dean, chair, and program leadership roles while many faculty members possess substantially longer institutional tenure and professional experience. This age-reversed authority structure can expose leaders to status incongruence, contested legitimacy, and resistance to strategic change. Objective: This narrative review examined how younger academic administrators can establish authority, build consensus, and lead change across age and tenure differences, with particular attention to transformational and transactional leadership, reverse mentoring, age and generational theory, and resistance to change. Methods: A structured narrative search of multidisciplinary literature published primarily from 2019 to 2025 was supplemented by foundational studies required to explain age-reversed supervisor relationships, leadership theory, and change resistance. Evidence was organized through iterative thematic synthesis and assessed for conceptual relevance, methodological strength, and direct applicability to higher education. Results: The synthesis identified five linked mechanisms: legitimacy is negotiated through competence and procedural fairness; age stereotypes are weaker explanations than relational age and status expectations; effective leaders combine transformational direction with transactional clarity; reverse mentoring and reciprocal learning convert age asymmetry into shared expertise; and resistance decreases when faculty retain voice, dignity, and meaningful influence over implementation. Conclusion: Younger academic leaders are most effective when they neither imitate seniority nor reject hierarchy. Sustainable authority emerges from credible expertise, transparent decision rules, reciprocal learning, and disciplined consultation. The central leadership task is therefore not to overcome older faculty, but to design relationships in which formal authority and accumulated experience reinforce rather than cancel each other.
Educational institutions continue to reproduce inequities in access, recognition, participation, professional development, and decision-making despite increasingly explicit commitments to inclusion. This structured review examines individualized consideration, a dimension of transformational leadership, as a relational...
Oluwatayomi Abiola· Edumania-An International Mu...· 0 citations
Executive positions are often described as being based on objective success criteria and key performance indicators (KPIs) serve as primary metrics—for example in science publications and third-party funding, primarily secured through project leadership. However, such criteria have been proven to be biased. While insti...
K. Grasenick, Pilar Flores Romero· Administrative Sciences· 0 citations
Teacher leadership is commonly presented as an empowering extension of professional agency, leaving insufficient attention to what teachers may surrender when they lead. This study examined the moral costs of non-positional teacher leadership through an interpretive qualitative design informed by Conservation of Resour...
Norma Ghamrawi· Management in Education· 0 citations
This manuscript reconstructs adaptive leadership theory through intersectionality, Black feminist thought,
critical race theory, and Foucauldian power analysis. It argues that adaptive leadership’s central constructs,
adaptive challenge, holding environment, productive disequilibrium, balcony view, and the leadership
a...
Jeffrey G. McKinney· INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEN...· 0 citations
Despite more than a decade of policy intervention, the share of women in leadership positions in Germany has remained essentially unchanged at approximately 29%, well below the EU average of 35.2% (Statistische Bundesamt 2025). While structural barriers are extensively documented, less attention has been paid to how wo...
Elisa Weisman, Anmol Kaur, Rania Azougaghe· European Conference on Manag...· 0 citations
This conceptual paper argues that differentiation in leader–member exchange (LMX), reflected in unequal access to trust, discretion, and developmental opportunities, is a common mechanism connecting three problems that management scholarship has traditionally examined separately: the evidentiary reliability of dismissa...
M. Willie· Feedforward Journal of Human...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.