Overall, GelMA scaffolds promoted greater cell viability and mineralized matrix formation, while PCL and PDO provided superior mechanical properties, highlighting the importance of balancing biological and mechanical requirements when designing scaffolds for hard tissue regeneration.
Abstract
Material selection is crucial to hard tissue regeneration, and matching scaffold properties to those of the target tissue can improve clinical outcomes. This study compared the physicochemical, mechanical, and biological performance of fibrous scaffolds fabricated from polycaprolactone (PCL), polydioxanone (PDO), and gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) for hard tissue regeneration. Polymeric fibers were produced by electrospinning, and their morphological, physical, and mechanical properties were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, n = 2), swelling and degradation analyses (n = 8), water contact angle measurements (n = 16), and tensile testing (n = 8). In addition, periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs), alveolar bone marrow stem cells (aBMSCs), and dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) were seeded onto the scaffolds to evaluate cell spreading (n = 4), viability (n = 8), and mineralized matrix formation (n = 6). Data were analyzed using one- or two-way ANOVA followed by appropriate post hoc tests (α = 5%). All polymers formed homogeneous fibrous scaffolds, with diameters within the nanoscale range. PDO and GelMA showed higher swelling than PCL, while PCL retained approximately 95% of its initial mass after three months. PCL and PDO showed higher elongation at break, tensile strength, and Young’s modulus than GelMA. Both PDO and GelMA displayed contact angles below 90°, with GelMA showing the lowest values. In vitro, all polymers were cytocompatible: PDO and GelMA enhanced DPSC viability at 7 days, whereas GelMA produced the highest viability for PDLSCs and aBMSCs at that time point. GelMA also promoted the highest mineralized matrix formation for DPSCs and PDLSCs, with no significant differences among polymers for aBMSCs. Overall, GelMA scaffolds promoted greater cell viability and mineralized matrix formation, while PCL and PDO provided superior mechanical properties, highlighting the importance of balancing biological and mechanical requirements when designing scaffolds for hard tissue regeneration.
Overall, HAp/PLGA/CS scaffolds showed potential as experimental bioactive platforms for bone tissue engineering, with 3D-printed scaffolds providing greater architectural control and favorable early osteogenic responses, although the translational relevance of these findings remains preliminary.
Jhon M. Pérez-Bohórquez, María C. Acero-Garzón, S. J. Gutiérrez-Prieto et al.· Biomimetics· 0 citations
These findings underscore the dual function of rGO in simultaneously improving the mechanical integrity and osteogenic capacity of CMC-based scaffolds, with 0.5%-1% rGO identified as the optimal concentration window for bone tissue engineering applications.
Ronghui Zhou, Yan-Jun Lin, Xiaojing Zhu et al.· Journal of Biomedical Materi...· 0 citations
Tissue engineering (TE) combines cells, biomaterials, and external regulatory cues to support tissue repair and regeneration. Graphene-based scaffolds are promising TE platforms because they combine electrical conductivity, mechanical reinforcement, and cytocompatible surface properties. When paired with electrical s...
Mohammad Alsenaide, Dusan Losic, Said F. Al-Sarawi et al.· ACS Omega· 0 citations
The results showed that the composite scaffolds effectively improved the inflammatory microenvironment in the defect region, promoted macrophage polarization toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype, enhanced cellular osteogenic activity and mineralization, and facilitated new bone formation and tissue reconstruction.
Fang Tong, Ting-Ting Lu, Lu Tang et al.· Journal of materials chemist...· 0 citations
This review brings together the electrospinning literature related to dental applications and explores the natural, synthetic, and composite polymer systems used to produce dental nanofibers and their applications in periodontal regeneration, alveolar bone repair, dentin-pulp regeneration, antibacterial and drug delive...
Nisha Shetty, C. N., Sampath Suranjan Salins et al.· Journal of Composites Scienc...· 0 citations
The scaffold showed the highest osteoinduction, and the scaffold with 530 ± 56 μm average pore diameter demonstrated the highest expression of osteodifferentiation marker genes in DPSCs, and the addition of nanoparticles into the polymer matrix led to the decrease in the expression of pro-inflammatory genes in macropha...
A. V. Yushkov, E. A. Kuvshinova, I. Bulygina et al.· Biomedical Materials· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.