Jul 2026· Revista de Estudos Interdisciplinares· 0 citations
TL;DR
The available evidence indicates that this technique represents a promising alternative for optimizing implant site preparation and promoting greater primary stability, particularly in low-density bone, however, prospective long-term clinical studies are still required to establish its indications, limitations, and clinical outcomes.
Abstract
The predictability of treatments with osseointegrated implants is directly related to the achievement of adequate primary stability, particularly in regions with low bone density. In this context, the osseodensification technique emerged as an alternative to conventional implant site preparation protocols, proposing the preservation and compaction of bone tissue during osteotomy through the use of Densah® burs, developed by Versah®. Unlike conventional burs, which promote bone tissue removal, osseodensification is based on controlled plastic deformation of bone, favoring trabecular compaction, autogenous bone particle translocation, and increased peri-implant bone density. These biomechanical changes have been associated with increased insertion torque, primary stability, and bone-to-implant contact, expanding clinical possibilities, particularly in areas with low bone density, such as the posterior maxilla. The aim of this narrative review was to gather and analyze the main scientific evidence regarding the use of the Densah® bur system, addressing its biological and biomechanical principles, clinical applications, advantages, limitations, and future perspectives in Implant Dentistry. For the development of this review, indexed scientific articles and classic studies investigating the osseodensification technique were consulted, with emphasis on experimental research, clinical studies, and literature reviews. The available evidence indicates that this technique represents a promising alternative for optimizing implant site preparation and promoting greater primary stability, particularly in low-density bone. However, prospective long-term clinical studies are still required to establish its indications, limitations, and clinical outcomes.
Neither the choice of drilling technique nor the implant macrogeometry significantly influences insertion torque or stability levels in regions of low bone density in this randomized controlled clinical study.
Worood A Akram, S. Bede· The Journal of craniofacial...· 0 citations
The rehabilitation of edentulous areas in the anterior maxillary region has a significant impact on esthetics, masticatory physiology, and patients' quality of life. In this context, owing to the high biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and optical characteristics of metal-free ceramic restorations, their combinat...
Viviane Afonso Mergulhão, Sandrine Beatriz da Silva Correia, Gabriel N. Desouza et al.· Revista ft· 0 citations
The use of sequential osseodensification protocols yielded superior mechanical stability parameters, specifically in IT and RT, in synthetic (polyurethane) bone models, but improvements in ISQ were predominantly noted in the denser type III model.
Silvio Yoshiaki Okagawa, A. D. de Souza, P. D. de Carvalho et al.· International Journal of Den...· 0 citations
Current evidence suggests that no single surface modification fully optimizes both osseointegration and bacterial resistance, however, advanced nanostructured and laser-modified surfaces demonstrate promising potential for improving long-term implant performance.
Aleksandra Jędras, Gabriela Czerepak, Weronika Pociask et al.· Quality in Sport· 0 citations
ABSTRACT Short implants represent a viable approach for the rehabilitation of areas with severe bone resorption, particularly in the posterior regions of the mandible and maxilla, as a minimally invasive alternative. The objective of this review was to analyze the available evidence on the use of short implants compare...
B. Rangel, Marco Antonio Rodríguez Ramos, K. Neppelenbroek et al.· RGO: Revista Gaúcha de Odont...· 0 citations
It can be concluded that it would be more appropriate to avoid placing dental implants into the COD and FD lesions and inserting the implants in the surrounding healthy bone, healed, or grafted bone tissues are preferred.
Fazele Atarbashi-Moghadam, Amirali Farahani Afsaryeh, S. Atarbashi-Moghadam et al.· Maxillofacial plastic and re...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.