A large-scale empirical study across a diverse set of embedding models and 275+ languages spanning three parallel datasets, exposing persistent gaps in cross-lingual semantic representation that track language prevalence in training resources and subword tokenization.
Abstract
Text embeddings are standard for semantic similarity tasks, yet their evaluation remains an open challenge. Current benchmarks are static, cover only a limited set of languages, are often domain-specific, susceptible to overfitting, and poorly representative of low-resource languages. To address these limitations, we introduce ALEE, a framework that extends Sentence Smith (Li et al., 2025) to the cross-lingual and paragraph level. ALEE uses Abstract Meaning Representations (AMR) to generate English minimal pairs with controlled, fine-grained semantic shifts, which are paired with translations in target languages. This approach enables targeted diagnostics for models in any language with English parallel data. We conduct a large-scale empirical study across a diverse set of embedding models and 275+ languages spanning three parallel datasets. On ALEE, performance varies substantially across languages, text lengths, and linguistic phenomena, exposing persistent gaps in cross-lingual semantic representation that track language prevalence in training resources and subword tokenization. We release ALEE at https://github.com/Andrian0s/any-lang-embed-eval
SOLAR is proposed, an auxiliary objective for supervised fine-tuning that aligns soft-token representations across languages, using English as a pivot and strengthens final-layer cross-lingual similarity and substantially reduces language-cluster separability, suggesting that aligning soft-token representations helps preserve shared semantic structure during multilingual reasoning.
Jiayi He, Jungsoo Park, Wei Xu et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
MTEB-PT is presented, a Portuguese benchmark constructed from a subset of MMTEB, comprising 14 existing datasets across Semantic Textual Similarity (STS), classification, retrieval, and reranking, and shows that language-specific fine-tuning still improves model performance in Portuguese, especially on task types that match the adaptation data most closely.
Lucas H.T. Okamura, Alexandre Alcoforado, A. H. R. Costa· 1 citation
Mathematical reasoning has become a central task for evaluating and tuning reasoning Large Language Models (LLMs), yet existing benchmarks remain heavily biased toward high-resource languages, with English and Chinese dominating both pre-training corpora and evaluation suites. The recently released PolyMath (Wang et al., 2025) dataset represents a significant step forward, yet its coverage is still limited to 18 only high-resource languages. To address this gap, we introduce PluraMath, an extension of PolyMath to 18 additional {underrepresented languages spanning 6 language families -- ranging from mid-resource to extreme low-resource settings. We constructed the dataset through a human-curated pipeline, where native speakers thoroughly validated pre-computed translations. Using PluraMath, we then benchmark 27 reasoning LLMs across four model scales -- small, mid-size, large, and closed-source ensembles -- probing the multilingual mathematical reasoning capabilities of state-of-the-art models under diverse linguistic conditions. Our fine-grained analysis confirms a persistent gap in mathematical reasoning performance between high-resource and underrepresented languages, with stronger results largely associated with better instruction-following ability. We fully open-source our dataset, data acquisition pipeline, and evaluation framework, with the goal of lowering the barrier to multilingual benchmark development for underrepresented communities.
Daryna Dementieva, N. Babakov, Kathy Hammerl et al.· 0 citations
As Large Language Models (LLMs) grow more capable across diverse tasks, their (in)ability to generalize remains difficult to quantify and poorly understood beyond limited domains. In particular, LLMs are known to struggle generalizing multilingually, to languages outside of English, and that are poorly attested in their training data. To understand why this may be, and what enables some models to perform better than others, we turn to a long history of work across the cognitive sciences, arguing that successful generalization derives from appropriate representations in similarity space. We look at how well LLMs'representations capture the hierarchical similarity structure between distinct languages. Strikingly, we show LLMs'latent representations largely recover the hierarchical structure of the Indo-European language family tree -- grouping languages that are members of the same subfamily closely together in representation space. Furthermore, we show that the degree to which models reflect the similarity structure of languages correlates with their performance on XNLI, a multilingual natural language inference benchmark. This extends classic work on similarity-driven generalization at scale, showing how models that represent similar languages similarly generalize better from one language to another.
Supantho Rakshit, Adele E. Goldberg, Henry Conklin· 0 citations
It is found that linguistic proximity itself introduces errors: closely related language pairs tend to perform worse, reflecting the challenge of semantic discrimination due to lexical overlap, and unlike other tasks where language distance poses additional challenges, it is found that linguistic proximity itself introduces errors.
Marta Vázquez Abuín, José Camacho-Collados, Marcos García· Annual Meeting of the Associ...· 0 citations
The results show that multilingual transfer is the dominant factor in extremely low-resource Bantu translation while eliminating the need for heuristic proxy selection, and all systems fail to preserve tonal diacritics, highlighting an open challenge.
Samiratu Ntohsi, Neza David Tuyishimire, Anesu Kafesu et al.· 0 citations