Skip to content
Book Open access

ADEPT: A Unified Framework for Deep Learning Test Adequacy

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 17 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The engineering details of ADEPT are presented, a framework that integrates representative adequacy techniques, including neuron-coverage-based metrics, surprise adequacy, input distribution coverage, boundary coverage, and source- and model-level mutation score, under a consistent execution workflow.

Abstract

Over the past decade, many test adequacy metrics have been proposed for deep learning that characterize test dataset adequacy from different perspectives, e.g., neuron activation behavior, latent feature coverage, decision-boundary exploration, etc. However, these metrics are typically released as independent research prototypes with substantially different installation and preprocessing requirements, execution workflows, and configuration mechanisms. These complications make them quite difficult to reproduce, compare, and adopt in research work and practical deployment alike. In this paper, we present the engineering details of ADEPT, a framework that integrates representative adequacy techniques, including neuron-coverage-based metrics, surprise adequacy, input distribution coverage, boundary coverage, and source- and model-level mutation score, under a consistent execution workflow. ADEPT provides a template-based metric interface with well-defined extension points for integrating new adequacy metrics. Furthermore, it provides YAML-based configuration management, preprocessing-cache reuse, and structured result reporting, making it easy to use in any research and development workflows. ADEPT is designed for researchers and practitioners who wish to reproduce and apply adequacy metrics without spending days or weeks implementing missing tooling or configuring disparate research prototypes. A demo video is available at https://aub.ie/ADEPT_video.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

A dataset of neural network architectures generated via large language models

This work uses large language models (LLMs) to automatically generate a dataset of neural networks that can serve as a benchmark for validation, designed to cover diverse layer types and to handle multiple input data types and tasks.

Nadia Daoudi, Jordi Cabot · 0 citations
Conference Open access 2026

DeepSeek-V3: Architecture and Optimizations-A Practical Review

The design of transformer-based Large Language Models (LLMs) is being radically changed through new architectures that are able to overcome scalability limitations of previous designs, including Mixture-of-Experts (MoE), Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA), and Multi-Token Prediction (MTP). As an open-weighted model rele...

Yassine Zouhdi, B. Hdioud · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Unified deep learning-based multi-dimensional quality evaluation framework for web applications

DeepQual-Web is introduced, a single multimodal deep learning framework for comprehensive quality assessment and optimization of web applications that combines Gradient Boosting Regression and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory networks to interpret the performance and reliability attributes of execution logs and sys...

I. Alharbi · 0 citations
#graph neural networks Open access Aug 2026

A Lightweight Hybrid Graph-Neural-Network and Heuristic Framework for Practical Software Vulnerability Assessment in Production Codebases

The significance of this work lies in demonstrating that a deployable, explainable detector can be assembled from compact components, and an edge-type ablation study, a cross-dataset evaluation, and a per-vulnerability analysis are reported to characterize the approach.

A. Elalfy, G. Ebrahim, M. B. Mansour · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

RecCompl: Efficient Model Compilation for Industrial Scale Recommendation Models with PyTorch 2

RecCompl is a comprehensive model compilation system that enables efficient model compilation of industrial scale DLRMs with PT2 and introduces a configuration-based user interface that decouples compilation settings from model code, allowing fine-grained control without intrusive changes.

Changji Li, Shuai Yang, Yuzhen Huang et al. · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Evaluating DL Test Adequacy Metrics: A Correlation Study with DeepCrime’s Mutation Score

Evaluating the quality of test suites for Deep Learning (DL) systems generally relies either on structural coverage criteria (e.g., Neuron Coverage), distribution-aware metrics (e.g., Surprise Adequacy), or mutation testing. While mutation testing offers the most reliable measure of fault-detection, it is often prohibi...

Tien Duc Nguyen, Gonzalo Oberreuter, Siegfried Steckenbiller et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.