Across competing automatic region-labeling mechanisms, CSGR annotations provide the most consistent gains over Cross Entropy-only finetuning in both in-domain and out-of-domain evaluations, indicating that the proposed labeling scheme captures useful region-level information.
Abstract
Vision Language Models (VLMs) should rely on visual evidence that directly determines the correct answer, but supervision for grounding visual reasoning is often expensive to obtain manually or tied to dataset-specific annotation primitives. We instead introduce model-causal visual evidence as an annotation target, defined as the set of image regions whose counterfactual intervention changes a model's answer distribution for a given image-question pair. Based on this principle, we introduce Counterfactual Search for Grounding Regions (CSGR). CSGR is a scalable pipeline that proposes candidate regions, perturbs them, measures their effect on answer sensitivity, and aggregates this evidence across multiple judges to approximate answer-critical regions in VQA data. To assess whether CSGR annotations contain a useful supervision signal, we plug them into three existing grounding-aware training routines: attention steering, Visual CoTfinetuning, and latent visual reasoning. These experiments test whether the proposed annotation scheme can provide a useful supervision signal across multiple ways of consuming region labels, rather than introducing a new way of using them. Across competing automatic region-labeling mechanisms, CSGR annotations provide the most consistent gains over Cross Entropy-only finetuning in both in-domain and out-of-domain evaluations, indicating that the proposed labeling scheme captures useful region-level information.
This work formulates active learning for VG under the realistic setting where only raw images are available without accompanying text, and introduces Referred Region Ambiguity, a new acquisition function that measures whether the model's confidence collapses onto a single region or disperses across multiple candidates.
Junbeom Hong, Seonghoon Yu, Hyungsik Jung et al.· 0 citations
The contrastive evidence gap is formalized, the per-token log-likelihood ratio that a model assigns to its own output when conditioned on a question-relevant region versus an irrelevant one, and it is shown that the gap is complementary to the model's own confidence.
Santiram Tiwari, N. Naik, Devbrat Pandey et al.· 0 citations
ReVA is proposed, a region-aware VQA model that employs a frozen CLIP ViT-L/14 Vision Transformer (ViT) and a Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct large language model (LLM) connected through a dual bridge that aligns both whole-image and region-level representations with the LLM's embedding space.
Look Before You Judge, a training-free framework that formulates explainable deepfake detection as a sequential evidence acquisition process, and improves detection accuracy by up to 12.8%, reduces CHAIR by up to 33.4% and hallucination rate by up to 21.3%, and outperforms representative training-free decoding and atte...
Chia-Ling Chen, Yu-Ting Ta, Jian-Yu Jiang-Lin et al.· 0 citations
Current image-text evaluation often relies on a global score, which gives limited insight into which semantic details are supported by the image. Explainable metrics provide rationales, but the visual evidence supporting those rationales can still be difficult to verify. We introduce VisExMEM, a reference-free evaluato...
Subhadeep Roy, Christoph Leiter, S. Eger· 0 citations
Rep2Act, a representation-to-action alignment method that translates latent answerability awareness into explicit abstention decisions, is introduced, a representation-to-action alignment method that translates latent answerability awareness into explicit abstention decisions.
Jia-Luo He, Huang-Xun Chen· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.