Skip to content
Open access

Comparative Analysis of CNN and Transformer Architectures for Real-Time Fire and Smoke Detection

Sep 2026 · Symmetry · 0 citations · 32 references

Abstract

Real-time automatic detection of fire and smoke is a critical component of modern safety systems in surveillance, industrial, and environmental-protection applications, where conventional sensor-based systems show fundamental limitations. In this paper, a comparative analysis of four deep-learning architectures—DETR, Faster R-CNN (ResNet-50-FPN), Faster R-CNN (MobileNetV2), and RetinaNet—was conducted on a heterogeneous corpus of 67,765 annotated images originating from four different datasets. All models shared the same data-preparation, augmentation, and evaluation pipeline, while each was trained with the default configuration of its reference implementation; the comparison therefore reflects each architecture as it is typically deployed rather than a comparison under a single unified training budget. Faster R-CNN with the ResNet-50-FPN backbone achieved the highest accuracy (mAP@0.50 = 78.7% on the Indoor set; 73.8% on the SmokeAndFire set) and the highest mean mAP@0.50 across all datasets (48.7%), obtained with an inference speed of 76.9 FPS and a latency of 13.5 ms on NVIDIA RTX 4090 hardware, which makes it a promising candidate for real-time fire-detection systems on comparable hardware. The main contribution of this work is a unified evaluation of four representative object-detection architectures across four heterogeneous fire-and-smoke datasets. The study further quantifies the performance asymmetry between fire and smoke detection through a normalized morphological asymmetry index, reflecting the consistently lower detection accuracy achieved for smoke owing to its diffuse and semi-transparent appearance, and provides practical guidelines for selecting an architecture according to real-time deployment requirements. Because each configuration was trained once with a fixed random seed and all speed measurements were obtained on a single desktop GPU, the reported differences are interpreted descriptively; their statistical validation, cross-dataset evaluation, and measurement on embedded hardware are identified as future work.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.