Skip to content
Review Open access

Reinforcement Learning for Automated Insulin Delivery: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions

Jul 2026 · Genetics and Molecular Research · 0 citations · 57 references

TL;DR

RL-based AID systems represent an important step towards fully autonomous and personalized artificial pancreas solutions and will be dependent on multidisciplinary collaboration between AI researchers, clinicians, and regulators to ensure safety, transparency, and reliability in next generation diabetes management.

Abstract

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of pancreatic β cells, resulting in complete insulin deficiency and an exogenous insulin requirement. However, despite the technological progress, classical insulin therapies and control algorithms such as Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) and Model Predictive Control (MPC) are not able to follow unpredictable glucose variations due to meals, exercise, and stress. Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) systems combine continuous glucose monitoring, insulin pumps, and algorithmic decision-making but remain limited by model dependency, computational load, and lack of personalization. Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a transformative paradigm for AI systems by modeling insulin regulation as a sequential decision-making process that learns optimal dosing policies from experience. Model-free RL algorithms like Deep Q-Networks (DQN) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) have demonstrated improved glycemic control, whereas model-based and hybrid RL algorithms have demonstrated increased safety and sample efficiency by integrating physiological constraints. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) further increases adaptability through neural network-based personalization over different patient profiles. RL can be integrated with wearable technologies, Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems, and digital twin simulations for continuous learning, remote monitoring, and patient specific optimization. Early clinical studies show improved time-in-range (TIR), reduced hypoglycemia, and improved long-term glucose control compared to traditional methods. However, there are still several challenges, including lack of real-world data, safety in online learning, interpretability, and regulatory compliance. Future advances will need to include the development of explainable and federated RL frameworks, lightweight models for wearable deployment, and multi-hormone control systems. In summary, RL-based AID systems represent an important step towards fully autonomous and personalized artificial pancreas solutions. Their clinical success will be dependent on multidisciplinary collaboration between AI researchers, clinicians, and regulators to ensure safety, transparency, and reliability in next generation diabetes management.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Reinforcement Learning for Personalized Insulin Dosing: A Comparative Study of A2C, SAC and PPO on Real-World Clinical Data

It is shown that higher cumulative reward does not necessarily correspond to better clinical decision-making in open-loop reinforcement learning environments, and the importance of behaviour-focused evaluation alongside conventional reward metrics is highlighted.

C. M. Anyanwu, Nkiru C. Ogbonna, M. Kam et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

A Novel Recurrent Deep Reinforcement Learning Architecture for Nonlinear and Temporally Dependent Control in the Artificial Pancreas

Because of the nonlinear relationship between blood glucose and insulin and the temporal dependencies in human metabolism, the artificial pancreas (AP), a device for controlling blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes (T1D), is limited in its ability to do so. The majority of traditional control algorithms produce less...

Madhav Prasad, Dr. Neha Tyagi, Debosree Sarma · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Meta-Learning in Biologically Informed Recurrent Neural Networks for Personalized System Identification of Glucose--Insulin Dynamics

This work embeds prior physiological knowledge about the glucose–insulin relation in the training procedure of RNNs, following the framework of knowledge-guided learning (KGL), and employs model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) to deal with interpatient variability.

S. De Carli, Nicola Licini, F. Corrini et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Multi-Objective Optimized Fuzzy Logic Control for Robust Automated Insulin Infusion in Type I Diabetes

The proposed fuzzy-control framework offers a promising automation-based strategy for resilient glucose regulation under uncertainty, measurement imperfections, and actuation delays, and the robustness of the proposed automated control framework is evaluated under challenging operating conditions.

Raya Abu Shaker, Yousef Sardahi, Ahmad M. Alshorman · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Hybrid Digital Twin Framework for Personalized Diabetes Management Using Mathematical Modelling and Machine Learning

A digital twin (DT)-based insulin dosage simulator with an individual’s metabolic system is proposed for personalized diabetes management and decision support for clinicians and shows improved glucose prediction accuracy, enhanced detection of hypoglycemia risk, and optimized insulin dosing strategies compared with tra...

Vathana Dennish, Babu Subramani, Vijayakumar Ponnusamy et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Self-tuned Blood Glucose (BG) Level Adjustment in Type-I Diabetes Patient based on Adaptive Control Approach

Type-I Diabetes Mellitus (TIDM) is characterized by autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells, resulting in absolute insulin deficiency and impaired glucose regulation. Maintaining normoglycemia is challenging due to the nonlinear and time-varying nature of Glucose–Insulin (GI) dynamics, meal disturbances, and p...

A. Patra, Smitta Ranjan Dutta, Anuja Nanda · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.