Skip to content
Open access

Effect of Active Insulin Time and Glycemic Targets on Automatic Correction Bolus Delivery.

Jul 2026 · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · pp. 19322968261465689 · 0 citations · 10 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Active insulin time is a key modifiable parameter influencing AB delivery and glycemic outcomes, and shorter AIT settings were associated with increased AB administration and improved TIR, whereas glucose target settings had no significant impact on these outcomes.

Abstract

Background

This study examined how automatic correction boluses (ABs) vary according to active insulin time (AIT) and glucose target settings, and how these parameters impact glycemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

Methods

Retrospective data from 287 individuals with type 1 diabetes using the MiniMed 780G system in auto-mode for at least 80% of the time over a minimum period of 6 months were analyzed. The AB delivery was evaluated in relation to different AIT and glucose target settings. Glycemic outcomes, including time in range (TIR 70-180 mg/dL), were assessed.

Results

Automatic correction boluses accounted for 33.1% of bolus insulin and 18.3% of the total daily insulin dose (TDD). Active insulin time settings significantly influenced AB delivery: individuals using a 2-hour AIT showed higher percentages of ABs relative to both TDD and bolus insulin, as well as higher AB doses expressed in IU/kg/day. Shorter AIT settings were also associated with improved TIR. In contrast, glucose target settings ranging from 100 to 120 mg/dL did not significantly affect AB delivery or TIR.

Conclusion

Active insulin time is a key modifiable parameter influencing AB delivery and glycemic outcomes. Shorter AIT settings were associated with increased AB administration and improved TIR, whereas glucose target settings had no significant impact on these outcomes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Insulin delivery characteristics and glycemic control in older adults with type 1 diabetes using the Minimed™ 780G system: a real-world analysis

While the MiniMed™ 780G AID system use is associated with low CGM-derived hypoglycemia exposure and highly effective glycemic control, regardless of customized settings, superior glycemic control is associated with a higher proportion of user-initiated manual boluses.

Š. Volčanšek, P. Vidmar, A. Janež et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Evaluation of an Objective Measure of Mealtime Insulin Administration Frequency in Emerging Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Objective measures of self-management are critical for understanding glycemic outcomes in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The mealtime insulin bolus score (BOLUS), derived from insulin pump data, is a validated indicator of mealtime insulin engagement in pediatric T1D populations, but its validity in emerging a...

Jessica S. Pierce, Mark A. Clements, Brent Lockee et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Early Consideration of Automated Insulin Delivery in Type 2 Diabetes: A Critical Review.

Randomized and real-world studies demonstrate that AID systems significantly improve A1C and time in range while minimizing hypoglycemia, without increasing treatment complexity or patient burden, and position AID as a practical and effective strategy to overcome long-standing therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes.

Z. Tariq, Grazia Aleppo, Anders L. Carlson et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Precision Insulin-Pump Calibration and Optimal Insulin Delivery to Improve Blood Glucose Levels

A simple, automated, and individualized insulin-pump calibration system based on a series of measures taken before and a few hours after carbohydrate ingestion, which modulate the shape of pre-meal insulin dosing to explicitly reduce postprandial BG levels while minimizing the likelihood of dangerously low BG.

I. Aganj, N. Bryant, Leah Morgan Panaro et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Informed Basal Insulin Optimization System in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Initial Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety, and Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes

CGM-informed basal insulin optimization with a prototype of Dexcom Smart Basal was associated with improvements in glycemic control and treatment satisfaction in adults with T2D, with a favorable safety profile, and the system may help overcome clinical inertia and support individualized insulin titration in real-world...

S. Oser, C. Crystal, K. Hames et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Automated Insulin Delivery in Infants with Type 1 Diabetes: Real-World Evidence to Support Future International Guidelines.

CGM is safe in very young children, with AID systems proving superior to traditional therapy, and real-world evidence supports incorporating AID consideration into future international guidelines from the time of pediatric diagnosis.

M. Marigliano, A. Scaramuzza, C. Arnaldi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.